• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Phytopathology News >The reality of a virtual laboratory: reference to personal herbaria and culture collections is bad science
【24h】

The reality of a virtual laboratory: reference to personal herbaria and culture collections is bad science

机译：虚拟实验室的现实：参考个人草药和文化收藏是一门糟糕的科学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Journals frequently worry about their impact factors, which are linked to the ISI rating of the journal and, debatably, also reflect the journal's standard. Impact factors reflect the citability and impact of the published work. Another aspect thatalso links directly with citability and impact is the availability of reference material (cultures and specimens) that can be used to repeat the work or test the hypotheses in future years, incorporating the latest state-of-the-art techniques. It is shocking, however, that few scientific journals have clear policies in place to ensure that authors have in fact lodged representative specimens and cultures in internationally accessible herbaria (Holmgren et al., 1990), which is an essential practice supporting good science (Agerer et al., 2000; Crous, 2002). Depositing representative material is an essential requirement, not only for the description of new species but also for all types of research addressing species characterization, genetics, pathology, and many other aspects. The International Code of Botanical Nomenclature explicitly demands deposition of type material in a herbarium (Articles 7, 9, and 37), but that this herbarium should be publicly available is only a recommendation (Article 7a).It remains, however, as one of the most basic principles of science that reviewers of scientific papers check and confirm that representative material is available in freely accessible collections.
机译：期刊经常担心其影响因素，这些因素与期刊的ISI等级相关，并且有争议地也反映了期刊的标准。影响因素反映了已发表作品的引用性和影响。与可引用性和影响力直接相关的另一个方面是参考材料（培养物和标本）的可用性，可用于结合未来的工作或检验假设，并结合了最新的最新技术。然而，令人震惊的是，很少有科学期刊制定明确的政策来确保作者实际上已将具有代表性的标本和文化放在国际上可获取的草本植物中（Holmgren等，1990），这是支持良好科学的一项重要实践（Agerer）。等人，2000; Crous，2002）。存放代表性材料是一项基本要求，不仅对于描述新物种，而且对于针对物种表征，遗传学，病理学和许多其他方面的所有类型的研究都至关重要。 《国际植物命名法》明确要求在植物标本室中存放类型材料（第7、9和37条），但应公开提供该植物标本室仅是一项建议（第7a条），但仍然是其中之一。科学论文的审稿人检查并确认可免费获取的馆藏中有代表性的材料是最基本的科学原理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号