• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Biological Conservation >Challenges and a checklist for biodiversity conservation in fire-prone forests: perspectives from the Pacific Northwest of USA and Southeastern Australia.
【24h】

Challenges and a checklist for biodiversity conservation in fire-prone forests: perspectives from the Pacific Northwest of USA and Southeastern Australia.

机译：易火森林中生物多样性保护面临的挑战和清单：来自美国西北太平洋地区和澳大利亚东南部的观点。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Conserving biodiversity in fire-prone forest ecosystems is challenging for several reasons including differing and incomplete conceptual models of fire-related ecological processes, major gaps in ecological and management knowledge, high variability in fire behavior and ecological responses to fires, altered fire regimes as a result of land-use history and climate change, and the increasing encroachment into forest landscapes by humans. We briefly compare two ecologically distinct fire-prone forest regions, the Pacific Northwest, USA and southeastern Australia with the goal of finding ecological conservation generalities that transcend regional differences as well as differences in scientific concepts and management. We identify the major conceptual scientific and conservation challenges and then present a checklist of questions that need to be answered to implement place-based approaches to conserving biodiversity in fire-prone forest ecosystems. The two regions exhibit both similarities and differences in how biodiversity conservation is conceptualized and applied. Important research and management challenges include: understanding fire-prone systems as coupled natural-human systems, using the disturbance regime concept in multiple ways, dealing with large fire events, using language about the effects of fire with more precision, and researching and monitoring fire and biodiversity at multiple spatial scales. Despite the weaknesses of present conceptual models, it is possible to develop a checklist of principles or questions that can be used to guide management and conservation at local scales across systems. Our list includes: establishing the socio-economic context of fire management, identifying disturbance regimes that will meet conservation goals, moving beyond fuel treatments as a goal, basing management goals on vital attributes of species, and planning for large events including post-fire responses.Digital Object Identifier http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2011.09.008
机译：在易火森林生态系统中保护生物多样性具有挑战性，原因有几个，包括与火有关的生态过程的概念模型不同和不完整，生态和管理知识方面的重大差距，火行为的高度变异性以及对火的生态响应，改变了火情土地使用历史和气候变化的结果，以及人类对森林景观的日益侵犯。我们简要比较了两个生态上不同的易燃林区，分别是美国西北太平洋地区和澳大利亚东南部地区，目的是发现超越区域差异以及科学概念和管理差异的生态保护一般性。我们确定了科学和保护方面的主要挑战，然后提出了一份清单清单，以解决在易火森林生态系统中实施基于地点的方法来保护生物多样性所需要回答的问题。这两个地区在生物多样性保护的概念和应用方式上既有相似之处，也有不同之处。重要的研究和管理挑战包括：将易火系统理解为自然人系统，以多种方式使用扰动制度概念，处理大型火灾，使用关于火灾影响的语言更精确，以及研究和监控火灾和生物多样性在多个空间尺度上。尽管目前的概念模型存在弱点，但仍可以制定原则或问题清单，以用于指导整个系统在本地范围内的管理和保护。我们的清单包括：建立消防管理的社会经济环境，确定将达到保护目标的扰动制度，超越以燃料处理为目标，基于物种的重要属性制定管理目标以及规划包括火灾后响应在内的大型事件。数字对象标识符http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2011.09.008

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号