State high court applies daubert to treating doctor, rejects de novo review

Chemical Regulation Group

首页> 外文期刊>Chemical Regulation Reporter >State high court applies daubert to treating doctor, rejects de novo review

【24h】

State high court applies daubert to treating doctor, rejects de novo review

机译：州高等法院将道伯特适用于治疗医生，拒绝重新审查

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

Expert testimony based on personal knowledge and experience is subject to judicial scrutiny for reliability,t he massachusetts supreme court held Aug. 17, rejecting a treating physician's expert testimony about multiple chemical sensitivity.

机译：8月17日，马萨诸塞州最高法院以个人知识和经验为基础对专家证词的可靠性进行司法审查，驳回了主治医师对多种化学敏感性的专家证词。

著录项

来源
《Chemical Regulation Reporter》 |2000年第36期|共2页
作者
Chemical Regulation Group;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类生产安全技术;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. State high court applies daubert to treating doctor, rejects de novo review [J] . Chemical Regulation Group Chemical Regulation Reporter . 2000,第36期

机译：州高等法院将道伯特适用于治疗医生，拒绝重新审查
2. Minnesota high court rejects'daubert', uses other standard in pesticide risk case [J] . Mark Wolski Chemical Regulation Reporter . 2000,第35期

机译：明尼苏达州高等法院拒绝“ daubert”，在农药风险案件中使用其他标准
3. What I Wish the Supreme Court Would Decide: Review by a U.S. Court of a Foreign Arbitration Award Issued in a Dispute to which COGSA Applies - What Standard Applies? [J] . LeRoy Lambert Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce . 2015,第4期

机译：我希望最高法院能做出的决定：由美国法院审查在COGSA适用的争议中颁发的外国仲裁裁决-适用什么标准？
4. WILLIAM DAUBERT, ET UX., ETC., ET AL., PETITIONERS V.MERRELL DOW PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES [C] . NAPARS anniversary conference;CATAIR anniversary conference;WATAI annual conference;ARC-CSI conference . -1

机译：威廉·道伯特（WILLIAM DAUBERT），ET UX。，ETC.，ET AL。，PETITIONERS V.MERRELL DOW PHARMACEUTICALS，INC。美国最高法院
5. Choices or Constraints? Applying the Kaleidoscope Career Model to the Careers of Female Doctors in China [D] . Wang, Shuo. 2020

机译：选择或约束？将万花筒职业模型应用于中国女医生的职业
6. Reviewing reliance on overseas-trained doctors in rural Australia and planning for self-sufficiency: applying 10 years MABEL evidence [O] . Belinda O’Sullivan, Deborah J. Russell, Matthew R. McGrail, 2019

机译：审查对澳大利亚农村地区受过海外培训的医生的依赖并计划自给自足：应用10年的MABEL证据
7. Treating the Pen and the Sword as Constitutional Equals: How and Why the Supreme Court Should Apply Its First Amendment Expertise to the Great Second Amendment Debate [O] . Browne David G. 2003

机译：将笔和剑视为宪法平等：最高法院应如何以及为何将其第一修正案专门知识应用于第二修正案大辩论

State high court applies daubert to treating doctor, rejects de novo review

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅