...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Physiotherapy >Selection of Pre-registration Physiotherapy Students Changing to a more objective process
【24h】

Selection of Pre-registration Physiotherapy Students Changing to a more objective process

机译：选择预注册物理治疗学生的过程将转向更客观的过程

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Selection interviews and the use of grade achievement via a points system continue to be used as the fundamental criteria for admission to most pre-registration physiotherapy courses in the United Kingdom. This traditional process has not always been shown to be effective in terms of student attrition rates and resources. Important policy drivers such as widening participation in higher education do not sit well with the many problematic issues that are emerging from the interviewing process, such as inadvertent bias and the potential for disadvantaging the very applicants (for example, those from minority ethnic groups), which the profession as a whole may wish to encourage. Many educators are questioning this process and recognise that the existing system is problematic and not conducive to promoting widening access and equal opportunity policies.This paper describes the changes in this traditional selection process undertaken by the BSc(Hons) Physiotherapy course team at Leeds Metropolitan University.The pre-1999 admissions process is described. The authors then outline the new process, which mainly involved the changing of two key issues:Elimination of interviewing as a means of selecting prospective undergraduate students.Development of an objective random selection process which would represent more accurately the diverse eligible applicant pool and be more representative of the population as a whole.This paper surveys a wide range of literature that explores the challenges of meaningful selection for health-related courses.A rationale for the case for change is offered. Data are presented as an interim audit, comparing student progression, achievement and outcome from the new non-interviewing process with the old system. There is an increase in the number of mature applicants, which may be a fairer reflection of the applicant pool. Applicants are also being selected with a greater range of entry qualifications.Further work needs to be undertaken on resources for staff. Confounding factors are discussed. The wider implications of equal opportunities for all those interested in a career in physiotherapy and the diverse nature of the total applicant pool are considered in relation to the new process and the needs of the profession.
机译：选拔面试和通过分数系统使用成绩成绩继续被用作英国大多数预注册物理治疗课程入学的基本标准。就学生的流失率和资源而言，这种传统的过程并不总是有效的。重要的政策驱动因素，例如扩大高等教育的参与，与面试过程中出现的许多有问题的问题不太相称，例如无意的偏见和可能使申请者（例如少数族裔群体的申请者）处于不利地位的潜力，整个行业都希望鼓励。许多教育工作者对此过程提出质疑，并认识到现有系统存在问题，不利于促进扩大获取机会和机会均等政策。本文介绍了利兹城市大学理学士（荣誉）理疗课程小组在传统选择过程中的变化描述了1999年前的录取过程。然后，作者概述了新的过程，主要涉及两个关键问题的变化：消除面试作为选择潜在本科生的一种手段;开发客观的随机选择过程，它将更准确地代表多样化的合格申请人池，并且更具代表性本文调查了广泛的文献，探讨了对与健康相关的课程进行有意义的选择所面临的挑战，并提供了针对这种情况的理由。数据以临时审核的形式呈现，将新的非面试流程与旧系统的学生进度，成绩和结果进行比较。成熟申请人的数量有所增加，这可能更公平地反映了申请人数量。还选择了具有更大入职资格的申请人。需要在人员资源方面开展进一步工作。讨论了混杂因素。考虑到新过程和该专业的需求，平等机会对所有对物理治疗职业感兴趣的人的广泛含义以及申请人总数的多样性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号