...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Preventive Medicine: An International Journal Devoted to Practice and Theory >Household smoking bans: which households have them and do they work?
【24h】

Household smoking bans: which households have them and do they work?

机译：家庭吸烟禁令：哪些家庭有吸烟者，他们在工作吗？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Background. This study characterized Oregon households according to type and degree of restrictions on smoking and explored whether smoking restrictions are associated with decreased environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure.Methods. A population-based, random-digit-dialed cross-sectional telephone survey of 6,199 adult Oregonians was performed in 1997 to provide baseline data on tobacco use in Oregon.Results. Seventy percent of Oregon households were composed of nonsmokers only, and 85% of those had a full ban on smoking inside the home. Of the households containing one or more smokers, 38% had a full household ban on smoking. Among respondents with a full ban in place, 99% of nonsmoker-only households reported that no one smoked in the home in the previous month, compared with 91% of households with at least one smoker. In both nonsmoker-only households and those with at least one smoker, full bans were strongly associated with awareness of the harm of ETS (OR = 12.8, 95% CI 7.3-22.3, and OR = 6.6, 95% CI 3.6-12.3, respectively). The presence of children in the household was also closely associated with full bans in the two types of households (OR = 4.6, 95% CI 2.8-7.6, and OR = 3.0, 95% CI 2.1-4.4, respectively). Nevertheless, 50% of households with children and a smoker present did not have a full ban in place.Conclusions. While the prevalence of household smoking restrictions is high in Oregon, there remains room for improvement, since 50% of households with a smoker and a child present do not have a full ban on indoor smoking. Public health messages that focus on household smoking restrictions may help protect nonsmokers from exposure to ETS.
机译：背景。这项研究根据吸烟限制的类型和程度对俄勒冈州家庭进行了表征，并探讨了吸烟限制是否与减少环境烟草烟雾（ETS）暴露有关。 1997年对俄勒冈州6,199名成年俄勒冈人进行了基于人群的随机数字拨号横断面电话调查，以提供俄勒冈州烟草使用的基线数据。俄勒冈州有70％的家庭仅由不吸烟者组成，其中85％的家庭完全禁止吸烟。在包含一个或多个吸烟者的家庭中，有38％的家庭全面禁止吸烟。在全面禁止吸烟的受访者中，有99％的非吸烟者家庭报告说，上个月没有人吸烟，而有至少一名吸烟者的家庭为91％。在非吸烟者家庭和至少吸烟者的家庭中，全面禁令与对ETS危害的认识密切相关（OR = 12.8，95％CI 7.3-22.3，OR = 6.6，95％CI 3.6-12.3，分别）。家庭中儿童的存在也与两种类型家庭的全面禁令密切相关（OR分别为4.6、95％CI 2.8-7.6和OR = 3.0、95％CI 2.1-4.4）。尽管如此，仍有50％的有小孩和吸烟者的家庭没有全面禁止吸烟。尽管俄勒冈州家庭吸烟限制的普遍性很高，但仍有改善的空间，因为50％的吸烟者和有孩子的家庭没有完全禁止室内吸烟。着重于家庭吸烟限制的公共卫生信息可能有助于保护非吸烟者免于暴露于ETS。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号