首页> 外文期刊>Preventive Medicine: An International Journal Devoted to Practice and Theory >Promoting stair climbing in public-access settings: an audit of intervention opportunities in England.
【24h】

Promoting stair climbing in public-access settings: an audit of intervention opportunities in England.

机译:在公共场所促进爬楼梯:对英格兰干预机会的审计。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Introducing message prompts at the 'point-of-choice' (POC) between stairs and escalators increases stair choice in 'public-access' settings (e.g. malls). For nationwide campaigns, plentiful POCs appear needed. We audited the availability of POCs in public-access settings across England. METHODS: Boundaries for 25 urban areas (population=6,829,874) were verified using Ordinance Survey maps, which showed all airports and train/tram stations. Malls and bus stations were identified from commercial listings and local authority web-pages. From September 2010-March 2011 two investigators visually inspected all venues (N=410), counting 'true' POCs and 'quasi' POCs (i.e. instances where stairs were visible from, but not adjacent to, escalators). RESULTS: 5% of venues had >/=1 true POC (quasi POC=3%). Aggregating across areas, there was a true and quasi POC for every 243,924 and 379,437 people, respectively. There were regional variations; one area had 10 true/quasi POCs, whilst 10/24 remaining areas had none. POCs were more common in airports (4/6 venues) than malls (11/85) and train stations (4/215). CONCLUSION: Although public-access POCs reach sizeable audiences, their availability in England is sporadic, precluding nationwide campaigns. Interventions should be considered locally, based on available POCs. Work/community venues (e.g. offices, hospitals), where pedestrians choose between stairs and elevators, may provide greater intervention opportunities.
机译:目标:在楼梯和自动扶梯之间的“选择点”(POC)引入消息提示会增加“公共访问”设置(例如商场)中的楼梯选择。对于全国性的运动,似乎需要大量的POC。我们审核了英格兰整个公共场所中POC的可用性。方法:使用条例调查图验证了25个城市地区(人口= 6,829,874)的边界,该图显示了所有机场和火车站/电车站。从商业清单和地方当局网页中识别出购物中心和公交车站。从2010年9月至2011年3月,两名调查员目视检查了所有场所(N = 410),计数了“真实” POC和“准” POC(即,从自动扶梯看到但不相邻的楼梯的实例)。结果:5%的场所具有> / = 1的真实POC(准POC = 3%)。跨区域汇总,分别有243,924和379,437人拥有真实和准POC。存在地区差异;一个区域有10个真实/准POC,而其余10/24个区域则没有。在机场(4/6个场所)中,POC比商场(11/85)和火车站(4/215)中更为普遍。结论:尽管公共接入的POC可以吸引大量的受众,但在英格兰的可用POC很少,不包括全国范围的运动。应基于可用的POC在本地考虑干预措施。行人在楼梯和电梯之间进行选择的工作/社区场所(例如办公室,医院)可能会提供更大的干预机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号