Reproducibility of microarray studies: concordance of current analysis methods.

Wayland MT; Bahn S

首页> 外文期刊>Progress in brain research >Reproducibility of microarray studies: concordance of current analysis methods.

【24h】

Reproducibility of microarray studies: concordance of current analysis methods.

机译：微阵列研究的可重复性：当前分析方法的一致性。

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

Many studies have addressed the reproducibility of transcriptomics studies with respect to platform (Shippy et al., 2004; Hollingshead et al., 2005; Petersen et al., 2005), sample quality (Ryan et al., 2004), sample storage method (Mutter et al., 2004), RNA amplification (Jeanette et al., 2003; Petalidis et al., 2003; Wilson et al., 2004) and assay variation (Zakharkin et al., 2005). Fewer have investigated systematic bias resulting from the experimenters choice of analysis protocol, and the majority of these have focused on one step in the analysis protocol, such as computation of expression measures (Shedden et al., 2005).

机译：许多研究都针对平台（Shippy等，2004; Hollingshead等，2005; Petersen等，2005），样品质量（Ryan等，2004），样品存储方法等方面的转录组学研究的可重复性（Mutter等人，2004），RNA扩增（Jeanette等人，2003; Petalidis等人，2003; Wilson等人，2004）和化验变异（Zakharkin等人，2005）。很少有研究者对由实验人员选择分析方案而导致的系统性偏见进行调查，其中大多数集中在分析方案的一个步骤上，例如表达量的计算（Shedden et al。，2005）。

著录项

来源
《Progress in brain research》 |2006年第0期|共17页
作者
Wayland MT; Bahn S;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类神经病学与精神病学;
关键词
Brain; Gene Expression Profiling; Genomics; 脑;

机译：脑;基因表达谱;基因组学;脑;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Reproducibility of microarray studies: concordance of current analysis methods. [J] . Wayland MT, Bahn S Progress in brain research . 2006,第0期

机译：微阵列研究的可重复性：当前分析方法的一致性。
2. Reproducible statistical analysis in microarray profiling studies. [J] . Mansmann U, Ruschhaupt M, Huber W Methods of information in medicine . 2006,第2期

机译：微阵列分析研究中的可重复统计分析。
3. Reproducibility of microarray data: a further analysis of microarray quality control (MAQC) data [J] . James J Chen, Huey-Miin Hsueh, Robert R Delongchamp, BMC Bioinformatics . 2007,第1期

机译：微阵列数据的可重复性：微阵列质量控制（MAQC）数据的进一步分析
4. Reproducible Statistical Analysis in Microarray Profiling Studies [C] . Ulrich Mansmann, Markus Ruschhaupt, Wolfgang Huber International Workshop on Applied Parallel Computing . 2006

机译：微阵列分析研究中的可重复统计分析
5. Clusters of coexpressed genes in the human and mouse genomes, mutational analysis of SNPS, and DNA microarray methods. [D] . Moon, Wonjong. 2006

机译：人和小鼠基因组中共表达的基因簇，SNPS的突变分析和DNA微阵列方法。
6. Correction to: Concordance analysis of microarray studies identifies representative gene expression changes in Parkinson’s disease: a comparison of 33 human and animal studies [O] . Erin Oerton, Andreas Bender 2019

机译：更正为：芯片研究的一致性分析确定了帕金森氏病中代表性的基因表达变化：33个人类和动物研究的比较
7. The bacterial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing are usually performed manually. Recently, the number of samples has increased and the need for automatification has grown. BioMerieux has investigated Vitek2 for this purpose. HUSLAB has assigned us to compare the identification and antimicrobial results with respect to routine methods and Vitek2. Furthermore, we evaluate test reactions, ESBL (Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase) production and the time what it takes to get results with Vitek2. In this study, we examined a total of 183 bacterial isolates including 76 ESBL-strains, 40 nonfermenting rods, 41 fastidious bacteria and 26 fresh clinical isolates. The results of routine methods were gathered from the patient database and following this, compared to the results given by Vitek2. Vitek2 correctly identified more than 96 f the ESBL-strains and fresh clinical isolates. The results of nonfermenting rods and fastidious bacteri a were 70 oncordant with those of the routine methods. Test reaction results of Api20E were 94 nd Api20NE 70 n concordance with Vitek2 results. Approximately 80 f all Vitek2 antimicrobial results and 90 f ESBL test results were correct. Compared to earlier studies, Vitek2 performed the tests faster than the routine methods. These results suggest that Vitek2 is capable of giving rapid and accurate results. However, nonfermenting rods and fastidious bacteria should be studied further. [O] . Järveläinen Marika, Roslund Iira, Silander Maarit 2006

机译：细菌鉴定和抗菌药敏试验通常是手动进行的。最近，样品的数量增加了，并且对自动化的需求也在增长。 BioMerieux为此进行了Vitek2的研究。 HUSLAB已指派我们比较常规方法和Vitek2的鉴定和抗菌结果。此外，我们还评估了测试反应，ESBL（扩展频谱β-内酰胺酶）的产生以及使用Vitek2获得结果所需的时间。在这项研究中，我们检查了总共183个细菌分离株，包括76个ESBL菌株，40个非发酵棒，41个营养细菌和26个新鲜临床分离株。从患者数据库中收集常规方法的结果，然后将其与Vitek2给出的结果进行比较。 Vitek2正确鉴定出超过96种ESBL菌株和新鲜的临床分离株。与常规方法相比，非发酵棒和精制细菌的结果为70。 Api20E的测试反应结果与Vitek2结果一致为94nd Api20NE 70 n。所有Vitek2抗菌结果约80 f和ESBL测试结果90 f正确。与早期的研究相比，Vitek2的测试速度快于常规方法。这些结果表明Vitek2能够给出快速而准确的结果。但是，应进一步研究非发酵棒和营养细菌。

Reproducibility of microarray studies: concordance of current analysis methods.

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅