...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Psychiatry >An argument for collaboration in methods to help people with mental illness.
【24h】

An argument for collaboration in methods to help people with mental illness.

机译：在帮助精神疾病患者的方法上进行协作的论点。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The paper by Larry Davidson and colleagues is very interesting and relevant to ensuring that the consumer voice is represented directly in research. It vividly describes the challenges and aspirations of mental health consumers by outlining their priorities for recovery. For the purposes of this Commentary, I'd like to focus on three major areas where I think this paper offers a significant contribution. The first involves the type of methodology - community participatory research - and its value in mental health. Secondly, I think it is imperative to include the end stage user/beneficiary of the research in every step of the research process. And lastly, this paper offers important implications for further applications particularly in the use of these methods in conjunction with more conventional quantitative methods.
机译：拉里·戴维森（Larry Davidson）及其同事的论文非常有趣，并且与确保在研究中直接体现消费者的声音有关。它概述了精神卫生消费者的康复重点，生动地描述了他们的挑战和愿望。出于本评论的目的，我想重点介绍三个主要领域，我认为本文可以做出重要贡献。首先涉及方法论的类型-社区参与性研究-及其在心理健康中的价值。其次，我认为必须在研究过程的每个步骤中都包括研究的最终用户/受益人。最后，本文为进一步的应用提供了重要的启示，特别是在将这些方法与更常规的定量方法结合使用时。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号