首页> 外文期刊>Qualitative health research >Member Checking: A Tool to Enhance Trustworthiness or Merely a Nod to Validation?
【24h】

Member Checking: A Tool to Enhance Trustworthiness or Merely a Nod to Validation?

机译:成员检查:增强可信度的工具还是仅是点头确认?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The trustworthiness of results is the bedrock of high quality qualitative research. Member checking, also known as participant or respondent validation, is a technique for exploring the credibility of results. Data or results are returned to participants to check for accuracy and resonance with their experiences. Member checking is often mentioned as one in a list of validation techniques. This simplistic reporting might not acknowledge the value of using the method, nor its juxtaposition with the interpretative stance of qualitative research. In this commentary, we critique how member checking has been used in published research, before describing and evaluating an innovative in-depth member checking technique, Synthesized Member Checking. The method was used in a study with patients diagnosed with melanoma. Synthesized Member Checking addresses the co-constructed nature of knowledge by providing participants with the opportunity to engage with, and add to, interview and interpreted data, several months after their semi-structured interview.
机译:结果的可信赖性是高质量定性研究的基础。成员检查,也称为参与者或响应者验证,是一种探索结果可信度的技术。数据或结果返回给参与者,以检查他们的经历的准确性和共鸣性。成员检查通常在验证技术列表中被提及。这种简单的报告可能不会承认使用该方法的价值,也不会承认其与定性研究的解释立场并列。在这篇评论中,我们在描述和评估创新的深度成员检查技术“综合成员检查”之前,先批评成员检查在已发表的研究中是如何使用的。该方法用于对诊断为黑色素瘤的患者的研究。综合成员检查通过在半结构化访谈之后的几个月为参与者提供参与并添加访谈和解释数据的机会,从而解决了知识的共同构建的本质。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号