• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Qualitative health research >Court reporters: a viable solution for the challenges of focus group data collection?
【24h】

Court reporters: a viable solution for the challenges of focus group data collection?

机译：法院记者：针对焦点小组数据收集挑战的可行解决方案？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Focus group interviews are a common approach to data collection in qualitative research projects. They are, however, a method with the potential for methodological and pragmatic difficulties, many of which stem from transcribing focus group data from an audiotape. An alternative to postinterview transcription is the use of a court reporter. Advantages found using court reporters were increased accuracy, timely receipt of transcripts, less distraction for focus group facilitators, guaranteed confidentiality, time saved reviewing transcripts, and convenience. Because court reporters do not traditionally work in health research, there might be issues with medical terminology that require diligence on the part of the researcher to ensure that jargon is appropriately identified and transcribed. Using court reporters in rural areas might be cost-prohibitive because of travel expenses. Court reporters offer a viable and worthwhile approach to data transcription, and in our experience, have provided our research team with rich and accurate data.
机译：焦点小组访谈是定性研究项目中数据收集的常用方法。但是，它们是一种可能会出现方法上和实用上的困难的方法，其中许多源于从录音带上记录焦点小组数据。采访后抄写的替代方法是使用法庭报道员。使用法院举报人发现的好处是准确性更高，及时收到成绩单，焦点小组主持人的注意力减少，保密性得到保证，节省了审阅成绩单的时间和方便性。由于法院记者传统上不会从事健康研究，因此医学术语可能存在一些问题，需要研究人员进行认真研究，以确保正确识别和抄写行话。由于差旅费，在农村地区使用法院记者可能会抑制成本。法院记者提供了一种可行且有价值的数据转录方法，并且根据我们的经验，为我们的研究团队提供了丰富而准确的数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号