首页> 外文期刊>Psychosomatic Medicine: Journal of the American Psychosomatic Society >Is type A behavior really a trigger for coronary heart disease events?
【24h】

Is type A behavior really a trigger for coronary heart disease events?

机译:A型行为真的引发了冠心病吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare chronic with acute mechanisms by which Type A might predict incident coronary heart disease (CHD). METHOD: The study included 2394 men aged 50 to 64 years who were assessed for CHD, Type A behavior, and CHD risk factors. Type A was assessed using the Jenkins Activity Survey (JAS), the Bortner scale, and the Framingham scale. Further examinations were completed at 5 and 9 years for incident CHD. RESULTS: After 9 years, there was no increased risk of CHD associated with any Type A score. Nevertheless, high Bortner scores were associated with increased risk of incident CHD at 5 years and high JAS and Bortner scores were associated with a decreased risk between 5 and 9 years. Further analysis of Type A scores on time to first coronary event found strong inverse associations for all type A scores (JAS = 205 -0.49 months to first event, 95% CI = -0.20, -0.78, p =.001) (Bortner = 176 -0.27 months; 95% CI = -0.10, -0.44; p =.002) (Framingham = 0.44 -0.0011 months; 95% CI = -0.0002, -0.0019; p =.01). CONCLUSIONS: The data show Type A is a strong predictor of when incident coronary heart disease (or coronary event) will occur rather than if it will occur. These findings suggest that Type A increases exposure to potential triggers, rather than materially affecting the process of atherosclerosis.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是比较慢性和急性机制,通过这些机制,A型可以预测突发性冠心病(CHD)。方法:该研究包括2394名年龄在50至64岁之间的男性,他们接受了CHD,A型行为和CHD危险因素评估。使用詹金斯活动调查(JAS),Bortner量表和Framingham量表评估A型。对CHD事件的进一步检查在5年和9年完成。结果:9年后,与任何A型评分相关的冠心病风险均未增加。然而,高Bortner评分与5年内发生冠心病的风险增加相关,而JAS和Bortner高评分与5至9岁之间的风险降低相关。首次冠状动脉事件按时对A型分数的进一步分析发现,所有A型分数均具有强的负相关性(JAS = 205 -0.49个月至第一次事件,95%CI = -0.20,-0.78,p = .001)(Bortner = 176 -0.27个月; 95%CI = -0.10,-0.44; p = .002)(弗拉明汉= 0.44 -0.0011个月; 95%CI = -0.0002,-0.0019; p = .01)。结论:数据表明A型是何时发生冠状动脉心脏病(或冠心病)而非何时发生的强有力的预测指标。这些发现表明,A型增加了潜在触发因素的暴露,而不是实质性地影响动脉粥样硬化的进程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号