• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Psychosomatic Medicine: Journal of the American Psychosomatic Society >PLEASE DON'T TALK BAD ABOUT GOOD OLD AUNT ANOVA!: A REPLY TO A.J. VICKERS' CRITIQUE
【24h】

PLEASE DON'T TALK BAD ABOUT GOOD OLD AUNT ANOVA!: A REPLY TO A.J. VICKERS' CRITIQUE

机译：请不要对良好的老方差分析说错！：A.J.维克的批评

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In a recent article, Vickers criticizes the use and abuse of Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) (1). He claims that there are at least two major problems. First, that the results of ANOVAs of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were either badly reported (meaning that very often only p-values but no measures of effect size were reported), ANOVA did not provide adequate statistics to contrast groups, and adequate measures of effect size were missing. Second, that the results of ANOVAs for repeated measurement were hard to understand and easily misinterpreted and therefore other kinds of analyses such as "longitudinal mixed models" or "generalized linear modeling" were preferable.
机译：维克斯（Vickers）在最近的一篇文章中批评了方差分析（ANOVA）（1）的使用和滥用。他声称至少存在两个主要问题。首先，随机对照试验（RCT）的方差分析结果被错误地报告（这意味着通常只报告p值，但没有报告影响大小的量度），方差分析没有为对比组提供足够的统计数据，并且没有足够的量度效果大小的缺失。其次，用于重复测量的方差分析的结果难以理解且容易被误解，因此其他类型的分析（例如“纵向混合模型”或“广义线性建模”）是可取的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号