...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology >Nonmedical use of ultrasound: bioeffects and safety risk.
【24h】

Nonmedical use of ultrasound: bioeffects and safety risk.

机译：超声的非医学用途：生物效应和安全风险。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Nonmedical ultrasound, also known as entertainment or keepsake ultrasound, is, as the name clearly indicates, the performance of obstetrical ultrasound with no medical indication but to provide the mother/parents to be with images or video clips of the fetus (on hard copy, tape, CD or DVD), also called "scanning for pleasure" (Chudleigh 1999). One of the most important issues to be addressed is that of safety of ultrasound and risk to the fetus. From a safety standpoint, who is right? On the one hand, commercial entities assure their customers that ultrasound is completely without risks. On the websites of several of these, one can read statements such as: "There has never been a harmful effect shown by the use of ultrasound. Many women have multiple ultrasounds during pregnancy with no negative effect on the baby." (First Look Sonogram 2002) or: "Extensive studies over 30 years have found that ultrasound has not been shown to cause any harm to mother or baby." (Americanpregnancy.org 2000) or: "Thousands of studies have been conducted. Nothing has surfaced yet that indicates any harmful effects in the use of ultrasound on animals or on humans." (Baby's First Images 2009) and: "...ultrasound has been monitored by the government for over 35 years and if it were not safe, hospitals, clinics and facilities like ours would not be allowed to use the equipment" (Fetal Fotos 2002). One site names benefits in addition to absence of risk: "Several studies have verified that it is a noninvasive tool with vast benefits... studies confirm that no adverse findings of diagnostic ultrasound levels have ever been replicated. In fact, new studies are showing its psycho-social benefit for expecting women..." (Geddes Keepsake Prenatal 2002). On the other hand, the Food and Drug Agency (FDA) is strongly opposed, stating: "...ultrasound energy delivered to the fetus cannot be regarded as completely innocuous. Laboratory studies have shown that diagnostic levels of ultrasound can produ...
机译：顾名思义，非医学超声，也就是娱乐性或纪念品超声，是在没有医学指征的情况下进行的产科超声的表现，但要为母亲/父母提供胎儿的图像或视频剪辑（硬拷贝，磁带，CD或DVD），也称为“愉悦的扫描”（Chudleigh 1999）。要解决的最重要问题之一是超声的安全性和胎儿风险。从安全角度来看，谁是对的？一方面，商业实体向其客户保证超声完全没有风险。在其中一些网站上，可以阅读以下语句：“使用超声波从未显示出有害作用。许多妇女在怀孕期间进行了多次超声波检查，而对婴儿没有负面影响。” （First Look Sonogram 2002）或：“超过30年的广泛研究发现，没有发现超声波会对母亲或婴儿造成任何伤害。” （Americanpregnancy.org 2000）或：“已经进行了成千上万的研究。尚未发现任何迹象表明使用超声波对动物或人类有任何有害影响。” （Baby's First Images 2009）和：“ ...政府对超声波进行了超过35年的监视，如果这种方法不安全，将不允许我们使用医院，诊所和类似设施”（Fetal Fotos 2002 ）。一个站点除了没有风险外还说出了好处：“数项研究已证实这是一种具有巨大好处的非侵入性工具……研究证实，从未重复诊断性超声水平的不良发现。事实上，新的研究表明它对预期妇女的心理社会好处……”（Geddes Keepsake产前2002年）。另一方面，食品药品管理局（FDA）强烈反对：“ ...不能将传递给胎儿的超声能量视为完全无害的。实验室研究表明，超声的诊断水平可以产生...

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号