...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Psychotherapy >Reflections on the meaning of clinician self-reference: are we speaking the same language?
【24h】

Reflections on the meaning of clinician self-reference: are we speaking the same language?

机译：关于临床医生自我指称的含义的思考：我们说的是同一语言吗？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Self-reference refers to clinician revelations about themselves. Theory and research on self-reference are limited by a lack of uniform conceptualizations. This paper discusses two types of self-reference, self-disclosure, and self-involving responses. Included are definitions of each type of self-reference; description of definitional inconsistencies in the literature; discussion of prevalence, functions, and the multidimensional nature of self-reference; and practice implications and research recommendations. The ideas presented herein are intended to prompt researchers, practitioners, and educators to carefully consider the nature, scope, and functions of self-reference, and in doing so, bring greater conceptual and operational clarity to their work.
机译：自我指称是指临床医生对自己的启示。关于自我参照的理论和研究受到缺乏统一概念化的限制。本文讨论了两种类型的自我参照，自我披露和自我参与反应。包括每种自引用类型的定义;文献中定义不一致的描述;讨论自我参照的普遍性，功能和多维性质;以及实践意义和研究建议。本文提出的想法旨在促使研究人员，从业人员和教育工作者仔细考虑自我参照的性质，范围和功能，并在此过程中为自己的工作带来更大的概念和操作清晰度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号