...
首页> 外文期刊>Psychotherapy >Common Factors: Post Hoc Explanation or Empirically Based Therapy Approach?
【24h】

Common Factors: Post Hoc Explanation or Empirically Based Therapy Approach?

机译:共同因素:事后解释或基于经验的治疗方法?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Laska, Gurman, and Wampold (2014, pp. 467-481) seek to expand the lens of evidence-based practice by incorporating the common factors perspective. We comment on Laska et al.'s arguments along with the methods used to reach their conclusions. Although we share their view that the common factors explanation for therapeutic equivalence across various orientations observed in the treatment outcome literature is both parsimonious and supported by the scientific evidence, we take issue with their suggestion that there exists a common factors "approach" to treatment in general or evidence-based practice more specifically. We provide clarification and friendly amendments to their language and perspective on the psychotherapy process and outcome research literature and its application in evidence-based practice.
机译:Laska,Gurman和Wampold(2014,pp.467-481)试图通过纳入公共因素视角来扩大循证实践的视野。我们对Laska等人的论点以及用来得出结论的方法进行评论。尽管我们同意他们的观点,即在治疗结局文献中观察到的针对不同方向的治疗等效性的共同因素解释既简约又得到科学证据的支持,但我们对他们的建议表示质疑,即存在针对治疗方法的共同因素“方法”一般或基于证据的实践,尤其是。我们对他们在心理治疗过程和结果研究文献中的语言和观点进行澄清和友好的修正,并将其应用于循证实践。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号