...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Plastic and reconstructive surgery >Qualitative and quantitative outcomes of audience response systems as an educational tool in a plastic surgery residency program.
【24h】

Qualitative and quantitative outcomes of audience response systems as an educational tool in a plastic surgery residency program.

机译：观众响应系统的定性和定量结果是整形外科住院医师计划中的一种教育工具。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

BACKGROUND: In-training evaluations in graduate medical education have typically been challenging. Although the majority of standardized examination delivery methods have become computer-based, in-training examinations generally remain pencil-paper-based, if they are performed at all. Audience response systems present a novel way to stimulate and evaluate the resident-learner. The purpose of this study was to assess the outcomes of audience response systems testing as compared with traditional testing in a plastic surgery residency program. METHODS: A prospective 1-year pilot study of 10 plastic surgery residents was performed using audience response systems-delivered testing for the first half of the academic year and traditional pencil-paper testing for the second half. Examination content was based on monthly "Core Quest" curriculum conferences. Quantitative outcome measures included comparison of pretest and posttest and cumulative test scores of both formats. Qualitative outcomes from the individual participants were obtained by questionnaire. RESULTS: When using the audience response systems format, pretest and posttest mean scores were 67.5 and 82.5 percent, respectively; using traditional pencil-paper format, scores were 56.5 percent and 79.5 percent. A comparison of the cumulative mean audience response systems score (85.0 percent) and traditional pencil-paper score (75.0 percent) revealed statistically significantly higher scores with audience response systems (p = 0.01). Qualitative outcomes revealed increased conference enthusiasm, greater enjoyment of testing, and no user difficulties with the audience response systems technology. CONCLUSIONS: The audience response systems modality of in-training evaluation captures participant interest and reinforces material more effectively than traditional pencil-paper testing does. The advantages include a more interactive learning environment, stimulation of class participation, immediate feedback to residents, and immediate tabulation of results for the educator. Disadvantages include start-up costs and lead-time preparation.
机译：背景：研究生医学教育中的培训评估通常具有挑战性。尽管大多数标准化的考试交付方法已经成为基于计算机的方法，但是如果进行了培训，则通常仍以铅笔纸为基础进行训练中的考试。观众响应系统提出了一种新颖的方式来刺激和评估驻地学习者。这项研究的目的是评估与整形外科住院医师计划中的传统测试相比，观众响应系统测试的结果。方法：对前十名整形外科住院医师进行了为期一年的前瞻性研究，使用的是听众反应系统，在学年上半年进行测试，在下半年进行传统铅笔纸测试。考试内容基于每月一次的“ Core Quest”课程会议。定量结果测量包括比较两种形式的测试前和测试后以及累积测试分数。通过问卷调查从个体参与者获得定性结果。结果：使用观众反应系统格式时，测验前和测验后平均得分分别为67.5％和82.5％;使用传统的铅笔纸格式，得分分别为56.5％和79.5％。观众平均反应系统的累积平均分数（85.0％）与传统铅笔纸分数（75.0％）的比较显示，观众响应系统的分数在统计学上显着更高（p = 0.01）。定性结果显示会议热情提高，测试享受更大，并且观众响应系统技术没有用户困难。结论：培训中评估的听众响应系统模式比传统的铅笔纸测试更能吸引参与者的兴趣并更有效地增强材料。优势包括更具交互性的学习环境，刺激班级参与，对居民的即时反馈以及对教育者的即时制表。缺点包括启动成本和提前期准备。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号