• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Psychology >Are written and spoken recall of text equivalent?
【24h】

Are written and spoken recall of text equivalent?

机译：文字的书面和口头回忆是否相等？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Writing is less practiced than speaking, graphemic codes are activated only in writing, and the retrieved representations of the text must be maintained in working memory longer because handwritten output is slower than speech. These extra demands on working memory could result in less effort being given to retrieval during written compared with spoken text recall. To test this hypothesis, college students read or heard Bartlett's (1932) "War of the Ghosts" and then recalled the text in writing or speech. Spoken recall produced more accurately recalled propositions and more major distortions (e.g., inferences) than written recall. The results suggest that writing reduces the retrieval effort given to reconstructing the propositions of a text.
机译：书写比说话少实践，字素码仅在书写时被激活，并且检索到的文本表示在工作存储器中的保存时间更长，因为手写输出比语音慢。与口语文本回忆相比，对工作记忆的这些额外要求可能导致在书写过程中对检索的工作更少。为了检验该假设，大学生阅读或听到了Bartlett（1932）的“鬼魂之战”，然后以书面或语音形式回顾了这段文字。与书面召回相比，口语召回产生了更准确的召回命题和更多的重大失真（例如推论）。结果表明写作减少了重构文本命题的检索工作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号