...
首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Surgery >Gastric cancer-related information on the Internet: incomplete, poorly accessible, and overly commercial.
【24h】

Gastric cancer-related information on the Internet: incomplete, poorly accessible, and overly commercial.

机译:互联网上与胃癌有关的信息:不完整,难以获得且过于商业化。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Patients increasingly use the Internet for gastric cancer information. However, the quality of the information is questionable. We evaluated the accuracy, completeness, accessibility, reliability, and readability of gastric cancer websites. METHODS: The Internet was searched for the terms gastric cancer evaluated for completeness (CS) and accuracy (AS) using predefined quality appraisal instruments (QAIs), reliability using an integrity score (IS), readability using the Flesch-Kincaid (FK) grade level, and accessibility using automated accessibility appraisal tools. Site sponsor and the presence of quality labels were noted. RESULTS: Fifty-one websites were evaluated. The mean CS was 100.3 (SD +/-44.9), AS was 107.22 (SD +/-47.9), IS was 15.3 (SD +/-3.7), and the mean readability grade level was 10.4 (SD +/-2.5). Only 5 websites had the minimum mandatory basic accessibility. Commercial sites and sites with quality labels had significantly more accessibility violations. CONCLUSIONS: Internet gastric cancer information is overtly commercial, generally incomplete, and poorly accessible.
机译:背景:患者越来越多地使用互联网获取胃癌信息。但是,信息的质量值得怀疑。我们评估了胃癌网站的准确性,完整性,可访问性,可靠性和可读性。方法:使用预定义的质量评估工具(QAI)在互联网上搜索胃癌评估的完整性(CS)和准确性(AS),使用完整性评分(IS)评估可靠性,使用Flesch-Kincaid(FK)评分的可读性级别和可访问性,使用自动可访问性评估工具。注意到现场赞助商和质量标签的存在。结果:评估了51个网站。平均CS为100.3(SD +/- 44.9),AS为107.22(SD +/- 47.9),IS为15.3(SD +/- 3.7),平均可读性等级为10.4(SD +/- 2.5) 。只有5个网站具有最低强制性的基本访问权限。商业站点和带有质量标签的站点明显更多地存在可访问性违规行为。结论:互联网胃癌信息是公开的商业信息,通常是不完整的,并且难以获得。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号