...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry >A place to live: Housing needs for people with psychotic disorders identified in the second Australian national survey of psychosis.
【24h】

A place to live: Housing needs for people with psychotic disorders identified in the second Australian national survey of psychosis.

机译：生活场所：澳大利亚第二次全国精神病调查确定的精神病患者的住房需求。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Objective: Access to adequate housing consistent with personal preferences and needs is a human right and supports recovery from psychosis. This study aimed to: (1) describe people with psychosis living in different housing types, and their preferences and needs; (2) explore selected demographic and social inclusion correlates in relation to housing; and (3) compare two subgroups - participants living in supported group accommodation and supported housing - on key demographic, functional, clinical and social inclusion variables. Method: Current housing, preferences, needs and assistance, and housing-related social inclusion variables were assessed in a two-phase prevalence survey conducted within seven catchment areas across five Australian states. Two supported housing models were compared: supported group accommodation and supported housing (rental accommodation with in-reach support). Descriptive statistics were used. Results: Of the total participants (n = 1825), one half were living in public or private rented housing (48.6%) and 22.7% were waiting for public housing. Despite being the preferred form of housing, only 13.1% were living in their own home. One in 20 participants (5.2%) was currently homeless; 12.8% had been homeless in the previous 12 months. Residents of supported group accommodation felt safer in their locality than those in supported housing, but experienced less privacy and choice. Conclusions: Although fewer participants were homeless compared with the first Australian survey of psychosis, the proportion remains high. Housing difficulties are experienced by people with psychoses living in various accommodation and concern housing adequacy and safety as well as autonomy and choice. Access to public housing is restricted compared with the identified need. Since residents of supported group accommodation felt safer in their locality than those in supported housing, but experienced less privacy and choice, each supported housing model may offer different advantages to people with psychosis, and contribute to services that support and maintain recovery.
机译：目标：获得符合个人喜好和需求的适当住房是一项人权，并支持精神病康复。这项研究旨在：（1）描述生活在不同住房类型中的精神病患者及其偏好和需求; （2）探索与住房相关的特定人口和社会包容性; （3）在人口，功能，临床和社会包容的关键变量上比较两个小组-参加小组住宿和小组住宿的参与者。方法：通过在澳大利亚五个州的七个集水区进行的两阶段患病率调查，评估了当前的住房，偏好，需求和援助以及与住房相关的社会包容变量。比较了两种受支持的住房模型：受支持的团体住房和受支持的住房（带有伸手可及的距离的住房）。使用描述性统计。结果：在所有参与者中（n = 1825），一半居住在公共或私人租赁住房中（48.6％），而22.7％在等待公共住房。尽管是首选的住房形式，但只有13.1％的人居住在自己的房屋中。目前有20人中有1人（5.2％）无家可归;在过去的12个月中，有12.8％的人无家可归。受支持的集体住宿的居民在当地比受支持的住房更安全，但隐私和选择较少。结论：尽管与澳大利亚第一次精神病调查相比，无家可归的参与者较少，但这一比例仍然很高。居住在各种住所中的精神病患者面临住房困难，他们关注住房的充分性和安全性以及自治权和选择权。与确定的需求相比，获得公共住房受到限制。由于集体住宿的居民在当地比居住在住房中的人更安全，但是隐私和选择较少，因此每种住房模式可能为精神病患者提供不同的优势，并为支持和维持康复提供服务。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号