...
首页> 外文期刊>The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry >Time to move on? Commentary on the early intervention in psychosis debate
【24h】

Time to move on? Commentary on the early intervention in psychosis debate

机译:分手后要往前看了?关于精神病早期干预辩论的评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Readers of this journal have recently encountered another round in the debate over early intervention in psychosis (Castle, 2012; Yung, 2012). But what exactly is the nature of this debate? There appears to be no dispute over the value of good quality care and treatment based on the best available evidence for people with psychotic disorders as early as possible in the course of their illness. There are no advocates for poor quality care delayed - long after suffering has commenced and disability has become entrenched.
机译:该杂志的读者最近在关于精神病早期干预的辩论中又遇到了另一轮辩论(Castle,2012; Yung,2012)。但是这场辩论的本质是什么?根据对精神病患者在病程中尽早获得的最佳证据,高质量的护理和治疗的价值似乎没有争议。没有提倡低质量护理的提倡者-在苦难开始很久之后,残疾就已经根深蒂固。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号