...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry >'Prodromal diagnosis' of psychosis: an impartial commentary.
【24h】

'Prodromal diagnosis' of psychosis: an impartial commentary.

机译：精神病的“前驱诊断”：公正的评论。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The Editor has asked me to provide a commentary on the editorials by Rosenman & Anderson [1] and McGorry [2]. In some ways, I could be seen as an unusually unqualified commentator, being neither a clinician providing early intervention services nor a psychosis researcher. However, I can at least claim impartiality, having no strong commitment to any position on this topic, and I have been an interested observer of the debates about early intervention for psychosis that have appeared in the psychiatric literature in recent years. Despite their apparently opposing positions, there appear to be a number of areas of agreement between Rosenman & Anderson and McGorry. I begin by summarizing these, then move on to where there is disagreement. Finally, I come to my own conclusion about what role, if any, 'prodromal diagnosis' should have in clinical practice.
机译：编辑已经请我对Rosenman＆Anderson [1]和McGorry [2]的社论发表评论。在某些方面，我既可以被视为非常规的评论员，也不能既不是提供早期干预服务的临床医生也不是精神病研究人员。但是，我至少可以要求不偏不倚，对这个话题没有任何立场的坚定承诺，而且我一直是近年来精神病学文献中有关精神病早期干预的辩论的感兴趣的观察者。尽管他们的立场明显相反，但罗森曼与安德森（Rosenman＆Anderson）与麦高里（McGorry）之间似乎在许多领域达成协议。我首先总结这些内容，然后继续讨论存在分歧的地方。最后，我得出自己的结论，即“前驱性诊断”在临床实践中应该起什么作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号