• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The American psychologist >Feminism and Psychology: Critiques of Methods and Epistemology
【24h】

Feminism and Psychology: Critiques of Methods and Epistemology

机译：女权主义与心理学：方法与认识论批判

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Starting in the 1960s, many of the critiques of psychological science offered by feminist psychologists focused on its methods and epistemology. This article evaluates the current state of psychological science in relation to this feminist critique. The analysis relies on sources that include the PsycINFO database, the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (American Psychological Association, 2010), and popular psychology methods textbooks. After situating the feminist critique within the late-20th-century shift of science from positivism to postpositivism, the inquiry examines feminists' claims of androcentric bias in (a) the underrepresentation of women as researchers and research participants and (b) researchers' practices in comparing women and men and describing their research findings. In most of these matters, psychology manifests considerable change in directions advocated by feminists. However, change is less apparent in relation to some feminists' criticisms of psychology's reliance on laboratory experimentation and quantitative methods. In fact, the analyses documented the rarity in high-citation journals of qualitative research that does not include quantification. Finally, the analysis frames feminist methodological critiques by a consideration of feminist epistemologies that challenge psychology's dominant post-positivism. Scrutiny of methods textbooks and journal content suggests that within psychological science, especially as practiced in the United States, these alternative epistemologies have not yet gained substantial influence.
机译：从1960年代开始，女权主义心理学家提出的许多心理学批评都集中在其方法和认识论上。本文评估了与这种女性主义批评有关的心理学的现状。分析的依据包括PsycINFO数据库，美国心理学会的出版手册（美国心理学会，2010年）和流行的心理学方法教科书。在将女权主义批评置于20世纪末科学从实证主义向后实证主义转变的过程中之后，该调查研究了女权主义者对（a）妇女作为研究者和研究参与者的代表性不足以及（b）研究者在实践中的实践的对雄性偏见的主张。比较男人和女人并描述他们的研究结果。在大多数这些事情中，心理学表明女权主义者所倡导的方向发生了相当大的变化。但是，与一些女权主义者对心理学对实验室实验和定量方法的依赖的批评相比，变化并不明显。实际上，这些分析记录了定性研究的高引文期刊中的罕见性，其中不包括量化。最后，该分析通过考虑挑战心理学占主导地位的后实证主义的女权主义认识论来构架女权主义方法论批评。对方法教科书和期刊内容的审查表明，在心理学（尤其是在美国实践）的心理学范围内，这些替代认识论尚未获得实质性影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号