...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The British journal of psychiatry : >Efficacy of three screening instruments in the identification of autistic-spectrum disorders.
【24h】

Efficacy of three screening instruments in the identification of autistic-spectrum disorders.

机译：三种筛查手段在识别自闭症中的功效。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

BACKGROUND: Screening instruments for autistic-spectrum disorders have not been compared in the same sample. AIMS: To compare the Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ), the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) and the Children's Communication Checklist (CCC). METHOD: Screen and diagnostic assessments on 119 children between 9 and 13 years of age with special educational needs with and without autistic-spectrum disorders were weighted to estimate screen characteristics for a realistic target population. RESULTS: The SCQ performed best (area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC)=0.90; sensitivity 0.86; specificity 0.78). The SRS had a lower AUC (0.77) with high sensitivity (0.78) and moderate specificity (0.67). The CCC had a high sensitivity but lower specificity (AUC=0.79; sensitivity 0.93; specificity 0.46). The AUC of the SRS and CCC was lower for children with IQ < 70. Behaviour problems reduced specificity for all three instruments. CONCLUSIONS: The SCQ, SRS and CCC showed strong to moderate ability to identify autistic-spectrum disorder in this at-risk sample of school-age children with special educational needs.
机译：背景：自闭症患者的筛查工具尚未在同一样本中进行比较。目的：比较社会沟通问卷（SCQ），社会反应量表（SRS）和儿童沟通清单（CCC）。方法：对119名9至13岁有特殊教育需求的儿童（有自闭症和无自闭症）进行筛查和诊断评估，以评估实际目标人群的筛查特征。结果：SCQ表现最好（接收器工作特征曲线（AUC）下的区域= 0.90;灵敏度0.86;特异性0.78）。 SRS的AUC较低（0.77），灵敏度高（0.78），特异性中等（0.67）。 CCC具有较高的敏感性，但特异性较低（AUC = 0.79;敏感性0.93;特异性0.46）。智商<70的儿童的SRS和CCC的AUC较低。行为问题降低了所有三种仪器的特异性。结论：在这个有特殊教育需求的学龄儿童的高风险样本中，SCQ，SRS和CCC表现出强到中等的识别自闭症谱系的能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号