...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The Drake Journal of Agricultural Law >YOU'RE NOT THE BOSS OF ME: AN ANALYSIS OF GIPSA'S AUTHORITY TO REGULATE PRIVATE CONTRACTING IN THE BEEF INDUSTRY
【24h】

YOU'RE NOT THE BOSS OF ME: AN ANALYSIS OF GIPSA'S AUTHORITY TO REGULATE PRIVATE CONTRACTING IN THE BEEF INDUSTRY

机译：您不是我的老板：对GIPSA监管牛肉行业私人合同的授权的分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The Packers and Stockyards Act of 1921 (PSA) has long provided fertile ground for litigation. Some of the more contentious litigation surrounds Section 202(a) and (b) of the regulation implemented to enforce the PSA - which, generally speaking, makesit unlawful for packers to engage in any "unfair" or "discriminatory practice" or "give any undue or unreasonable preference or advantage" to any particular producer. Per Congressional mandate, and perhaps to clarify multiple Circuit Court rulings, the USDA recently released proposed rules that are intended to clear up some of the ambiguities in Section 202(a) and (b) by providing specific examples of unfair or unjust behavior exhibited by packers. The proposed rules also provide sweeping regulation regarding the USDA's ability to enforce Section 202. These proposed rules represent the first time that Section 202 of the PSA has undergone significant revisions since the Act's implementation in 1921.
机译：《 1921年包装工人和牲畜饲养场法案》（PSA）长期以来为诉讼提供了沃土。一些更具争议性的诉讼围绕实施PSA实施的法规第202（a）和（b）条-通常来说，这使包装工从事任何“不公平”或“歧视性做法”或“给予任何对任何特定生产者的不当或不合理的偏好或优势。根据国会的授权，也许是为了澄清巡回法院的多项裁决，美国农业部最近发布了拟议的规则，旨在通过提供具体示例，阐明由美国联邦政府展示的不公平或不公正行为的第202（a）和（b）节中的某些歧义。封隔器。拟议的规则还提供了有关USDA执行第202条的能力的详尽规定。这些拟议的规则代表PSA第202条自1921年实施以来首次进行重大修订。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号