...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The Drake Journal of Agricultural Law >RESOLUTION OF AN APPARENT CONFLICT: ROWLEY VERSUS ANDERSON
【24h】

RESOLUTION OF AN APPARENT CONFLICT: ROWLEY VERSUS ANDERSON

机译：解决明显冲突的方法：ROWLEY VERSUS ANDERSON

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Chapter 12 is the chapter of the bankruptcy code designed specifically for farmers. Because of their unique position in the American enterprise and our desire as a people to protect their contribution, Congress enacted Chapter 12 to specifically address issues farmers face when in bankruptcy. For guidance, Congress looked to Chapter 13, an existing chapter of the bankruptcy code. It is from the modeling of Chapter 12 after Chapter 13 that the issue of this paper arises. Given the heavy reliance uponChapter 13 by Congress in enacting Chapter 12, it seems logical that a conflict would eventually arise, if the administration of the respective chapters was seemingly at odds. This paper will address the conflict between section 1225(b)(l)(B) and section1325(b)(l)(B) of the code. Identical in their substance, it has been argued that they have not been identical in their application. From an examination of two lodestar cases, Rowley v. Yamall and In Re Anderson, there is arguably no conflict at all.
机译：第12章是专门为农民设计的破产法规的这一章。由于他们在美国企业中的独特地位以及我们作为一个人民希望保护自己的贡献的愿望，国会颁布了第12章专门解决农民在破产时面临的问题。为了提供指导，国会参考了破产法第十三章。正是从第13章之后的第12章建模中得出了本文的主题。鉴于国会在制定第12章时严重依赖第13章，如果各章的执行似乎有分歧，那么最终会发生冲突似乎是合乎逻辑的。本文将解决该法规第1225（b）（l）（B）条与第1325（b）（l）（B）条之间的冲突。他们的实质是相同的，有人认为它们的应用并不相同。通过对两个罗伊德斯塔案件的审理，罗利诉亚马尔（Rowley v。Yamall）和安瑞森（Re And Anderson），可以说根本没有冲突。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号