• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The Drake Journal of Agricultural Law >UNCLE SAM WANTS YOU - TO EAT BEEF?
【24h】

UNCLE SAM WANTS YOU - TO EAT BEEF?

机译：叔叔山姆想要你-吃牛肉？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Consumers might be surprised to discover that ads touting "Beef, it's what's for dinner" actually are messages from the federal government, rather than the beef industry. Nevertheless, that was the Supreme Court's conclusion in Johanns v. Livestock Marketing Association. This case addressed whether regulated parties can be compelled by law to contribute to generic industry messages. The Court held that mandatory payments from cattle sellers to fund the beef promotion program raised no free speech violations. Additionally, the generic beef ads were actually government speech, not messages from the Beef Council or any other private party. Also, the Court ruled that the federal government could collect fees to fund these messages just like government collects any other taxes to support its activities.
机译：消费者可能会惊讶地发现，吹捧“牛肉，这就是晚餐”的广告实际上是来自联邦政府而不是牛肉行业的信息。尽管如此，这是最高法院在Johanns诉牲畜营销协会一案中的结论。该案解决了受规制方是否可以被法律强迫为通用工业信息做出贡献。法院认为，卖牛者为牛肉推广计划提供的强制性付款没有违反言论自由。此外，通用牛肉广告实际上是政府的言论，而不是来自牛肉理事会或任何其他私人团体的消息。同样，法院裁定，联邦政府可以收取费用以资助这些信息，就像政府收取任何其他税款来支持其活动一样。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号