...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The Drake Journal of Agricultural Law >MAD COWS AND ANGRY PLAINTIFFS: WHY COMPLIANCE WITH GOVERNMENTAL REGULATIONS WILL NOT PROTECT BUSINESS FROM LAWSUITS BY INDIVIDUALS THAT CONTRACT MAD COW DISEASE
【24h】

MAD COWS AND ANGRY PLAINTIFFS: WHY COMPLIANCE WITH GOVERNMENTAL REGULATIONS WILL NOT PROTECT BUSINESS FROM LAWSUITS BY INDIVIDUALS THAT CONTRACT MAD COW DISEASE

机译：疯牛病和愤怒的平地：为什么遵守政府法规将不会使签约疯牛病的个人从诉讼中保护企业

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The United States probably has one of the safest food supplies in the world. A total of twelve different federal government agencies share responsibility for this enormous feat, although this approach is subject to criticism. In particular, the Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") and the less well-known Food Safety and Inspection Service ("FSIS") of the Department of Agriculture play crucial roles in assuring Americans that their food is safe to eat. The FSIS "is the public health agency in the U.S.Department of Agriculture responsible for ensuring that the nation's commercial supply of meat, poultry, and egg products is safe, wholesome, and correctly labeled and packaged."
机译：美国可能是世界上最安全的食品供应之一。尽管这种方法受到批评，但共有十二个不同的联邦政府机构共同承担这一巨大的责任。尤其是，食品和药物管理局（“ FDA”）和鲜为人知的农业部食品安全与检验服务（“ FSIS”）在确保美国人可以安全食用食品方面起着至关重要的作用。 FSIS“是美国农业部的公共卫生机构，负责确保该国家的肉类，禽类和蛋类产品的商业供应安全，有益健康，并正确标记和包装。”

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号