...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The International journal of social psychiatry >Psychiatric and psychotherapeutic literacy: attitudes to, and knowledge of, psychotherapy.
【24h】

Psychiatric and psychotherapeutic literacy: attitudes to, and knowledge of, psychotherapy.

机译：精神病学和心理治疗素养：对心理疗法的态度和知识。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

BACKGROUND: Whereas there is now a rapidly emerging literature on psychiatric literacy (Jorm, 2000), there is much less work on the public's knowledge of, and beliefs about the purpose of, and processes involved in, psychotherapy. This study looked at what lay people think happens during psychotherapy; what the processes and aims are; and the aetiology, treatment and prognosis for a mood and psychotic (bipolar, schizophrenia) and two neurotic (depression, obsessive-compulsive) disorders. METHODS: In total 185 British adults, recruited by a market research company, completed a four-part questionnaire, lasting about 20 minutes. RESULTS: Participants were generally very positive about psychotherapy believing the experience to be highly beneficial. Schizophrenia was seen to have a biological basis; depression and bipolar disorder were perceived to have family, work and other stress-related causal issues; obsessive-compulsive disorder was seen to be caused by stress and family-related issues. Participants thought psychotherapy a very effective treatment but drug treatments more effective for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. 'Talking it over' was judged highly relevant, specifically to depression. Participants believed that depression had a good chance of cure, and remission, but that neither schizophrenia nor bipolar disorder had much chance of an effective cure. CONCLUSION: Lay people show a curious pattern on insight, ignorance and naivety with regard to the cause and cure of mental disorders. They appear to have a modestly realistic but somewhat naive view of the process and efficacy of psychotherapy. This may influence how they react to their own and others' mental illness. It has clear implications for education in psychiatric literacy.
机译：背景：尽管现在有关于精神科素养的迅速涌现的文献（Jorm，2000年），但关于公众对心理治疗的目的和过程的认识，信念以及有关过程的工作却很少。这项研究着眼于人们在心理治疗过程中的看法。过程和目标是什么;以及情绪和精神病（双相型，精神分裂症）和两种神经质（抑郁症，强迫症）的病因，治疗和预后。方法：由市场研究公司招募的总共185名英国成年人填写了一份由四部分组成的问卷，问卷持续约20分钟。结果：参与者通常对心理治疗非常乐观，认为这种经历非常有益。精神分裂症被认为具有生物学基础。人们认为抑郁症和躁郁症有家庭，工作和其他与压力有关的因果关系;强迫症被认为是由压力和家庭相关问题引起的。参与者认为心理疗法是一种非常有效的治疗方法，但是药物治疗对于精神分裂症和躁郁症更有效。人们认为，“说出来”与抑郁症息息相关。参加者认为抑郁症有很好的治愈和缓解的机会，但是精神分裂症和双相情感障碍都没有有效治愈的机会。结论：躺着的人对精神障碍的原因和治疗方法的洞察力，无知和天真表现出一种奇怪的模式。他们似乎对心理治疗的过程和功效持中等程度的现实，但有些幼稚。这可能会影响他们对自己和他人的精神疾病的反应。它对精神素养教育有着明显的意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号