...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The International journal of drug policy >Preferences for policy options for cannabis in an Australian general population: A discrete choice experiment
【24h】

Preferences for policy options for cannabis in an Australian general population: A discrete choice experiment

机译：澳大利亚普通民众对大麻政策选择的偏好：离散选择实验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Background: Policy choices for illicit drugs such as cannabis entail consideration of competing factors such as individual health, societal views about pleasure, and criminal justice impacts. Society must weigh up these factors in determining the preferred cannabis policy; although often cast as a contest between legalisation of cannabis or full prohibition the actual policy choices are not so black and white. This study assessed societal preferences for different cannabis policies and multiple consequences. Method: A discrete choice experiment (DCE) quantified value-based preferences for alternative cannabis policies described by the five key attributes legal status, health harms, criminal justice service costs, rates of cannabis use and purchase location. An online survey was conducted on a population sample of 1020 Australians. The analytical model was based on stated choices for Policy A, B or Current Policy. Results: The results revealed a strong general preference for either civil penalties or legalisation compared to cannabis cautioning (Current Policy) and a strong dislike of criminalising possession and use of cannabis. Results also demonstrate difference in preferences among those with different demographics and beliefs. Understanding these nuances help to quantify the range of preferences held within the population and can be used to inform policy. Conclusion: This is the first known DCE survey applied to the area of illicit drugs policy. It demonstrates the public hold disparate views on the most appropriate status for cannabis offences and they are able to make trade-offs between policy choices and outcomes in complex areas of social policy.
机译：背景：针对大麻等非法药物的政策选择需要考虑竞争因素，例如个人健康，社会对享乐的看法以及刑事司法影响。社会在决定首选大麻政策时必须权衡这些因素;尽管通常是在大麻合法化或完全禁止之间进行较量，但实际的政策选择并非如此。这项研究评估了不同大麻政策的社会偏好以及多重后果。方法：离散选择实验（DCE）对替代大麻政策的基于价值的偏好进行了量化，由以下五个关键属性来描述：法律地位，健康危害，刑事司法服务成本，大麻使用率和购买地点。对1020名澳大利亚人进行了在线调查。分析模型基于策略A，B或当前策略的既定选择。结果：结果显示，与大麻警告（现行政策）相比，人们普遍更倾向于民事处罚或合法化，并且不喜欢将拥有和使用大麻定为刑事犯罪。结果还表明，具有不同人口统计学和信仰的人的偏好有所不同。了解这些细微差别有助于量化人群中所拥有的偏好范围，并可用于为政策提供依据。结论：这是首次将DCE调查应用于非法药物政策领域。它表明公众对大麻犯罪的最适当地位持有不同的看法，并且他们能够在社会政策的复杂领域中，在政策选择和结果之间做出取舍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号