...
首页> 外文期刊>The International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis >A cross-validation of two differing measures of hypnotic depth
【24h】

A cross-validation of two differing measures of hypnotic depth

机译:两种不同的催眠深度测量值的交叉验证

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Several sets of regression analyses were completed, attempting to predict 2 measures of hypnotic depth: the self-reported hypnotic depth score and hypnoidal state score from variables of the Phenomenology of Consciousness Inventory: Hypnotic Assessment Procedure (PCI-HAP). When attempting to predict self-reported hypnotic depth, an R of.78 with Study 1 participants shrank to an r of.72 with Study 2 participants, suggesting mild shrinkage for this more attributional measure of hypnotic depth. Attempting to predict hypnoidal state (an estimate of trance) using the same procedure, yielded an R of.56, that upon cross-validation shrank to an r of.48. These and other results suggest that, although there is some variance in common, the self-reported hypnotic depth score appears to be tapping a different construct from the hypnoidal state score.
机译:完成了几组回归分析,试图通过意识清单现象学:催眠评估程序(PCI-HAP)的变量来预测2种催眠深度测量值:自我报告的催眠深度评分和催眠状态评分。试图预测自我报告的催眠深度时,研究1参与者的R值为78,研究2参与者的R值为72,这表明对催眠深度的这种更归因性测度有轻微的收缩。尝试使用相同的方法预测催眠状态(tr的估计),得出R值为56,而交叉验证时的R值为48。这些和其他结果表明,尽管存在一些共同点,但自我报告的催眠深度评分似乎正在从与催眠状态评分不同的结构中获取。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号