...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The International journal of drug policy >Making residential cannabis growing operations actionable: A critical policy analysis
【24h】

Making residential cannabis growing operations actionable: A critical policy analysis

机译：使民用大麻种植业务切实可行：一项关键政策分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Background: In 2006, the British Columbia (BC) government passed amendments to its Safety Standards Act. These amendments permit the routine disclosure of electrical usage information from electrical producers to BC's municipalities, ostensibly to identify and eradicate residential cannabis growing operations (grow ops). These amendments originated in a pilot project in Surrey, BC, known as the electrical and fire safety inspection initiative (EFSI), which drew together police, firefighters and others, to identify grow ops through the process of municipal electrical inspections.Methods: This paper draws on narrative analysis to critically explore how the report of the EFSI Surrey pilot project uses a series of linked claims to generate interpretative change in the definition of the problem of grow ops. This analysis also shows how claims about grow ops are constructed and gain their potency through links with other social problems, persons, and practices.Results: Though the report of the EFSI project is a prohibitionist text replete with stock characters and themes from the history of Canadian drug policy, the problem of residential cannabis cultivation is made actionable by establishing grow operators as "superdeviants" constructed both as dangerous outsiders and as risks to a host of public safety concerns. These claims are then linked to the notion of an overwhelmed criminal justice system that establishes a "crisis" that justifies extraordinary methods of social control outside the due process of the criminal justice system.Conclusions: Construction of all cannabis cultivators as "dangerous" disavows other possibilities and shores up neo-liberal practices of government that draw on multi-partner initiatives to implement extraordinary methods of social control not necessarily subject to public accountability.
机译：背景：2006年，不列颠哥伦比亚省（BC）政府通过了《安全标准法》的修正案。这些修正案允许从电力生产商向不列颠哥伦比亚省的各市例行披露电力使用信息，表面上是为了识别和根除居民大麻种植业务（增长行动）。这些修正案起源于不列颠哥伦比亚省萨里市的一个试点项目，称为电气和消防安全检查倡议（EFSI），该项目召集了警察，消防员和其他人员，以通过市政电气检查过程确定增长的机会。利用叙事分析来批判性地探索EFSI萨里（EFSI）试点项目的报告如何使用一系列链接的声明来对增长机会问题的定义产生解释性的变化。该分析还显示了关于增长机会的主张是如何构建的，以及如何通过与其他社会问题，人员和实践的联系而获得效用的。结果：尽管EFSI项目的报告是禁止主义文本，但充斥着来自历史的股票特征和主题。根据加拿大的毒品政策，通过将种植经营者确立为“超人”，既可以构成危险的局外人，也可以构成一系列公共安全隐患的风险，从而使居民大麻的种植问题具有可操作性。这些主张然后与不堪重负的刑事司法制度的概念相关联，该观念建立了一种“危机”，证明了在刑事司法制度的正当程序之外采取特殊的社会控制方法的必要。结论：将所有大麻种植者视为“危险的”建设者则不赞成其他可能性，并支持政府的新自由主义实践，这些实践利用多伙伴计划来实施不一定受公共问责制约束的非常规社会控制方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号