...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The International journal of drug policy >Rhetoric, reality and research: what they mean for achieving the best possible treatment system for addiction-related problems.
【24h】

Rhetoric, reality and research: what they mean for achieving the best possible treatment system for addiction-related problems.

机译：修辞，现实和研究：对成瘾相关问题实现最佳可能治疗系统的意义。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Policy options for dealing with alcohol and drug dependence are hotly contested and usually involve ideological, existential and financial considerations. Nowhere is this more obvious than in the discourses surrounding abstinence and harm reduction. The original research by McKeganey, Morris, Neale, and Robertson (2004), described in this journal issue by Neale, Nettleton, and Pickering (2011), fuelled the fires of debate without contributing new information. Worse still, were the subsequent press statements from those vested in promoting an abstinence-only agenda and willing to make throwaway statements around harm reduction (Abetz, 2010; McKeganey, 2005; Watt, 2007). Thankfully, Neale and colleagues have constructively addressed some of the pitfalls of the DORIS study through the use of qualitative methods to further unpack the question of what do people seek when they enter treatment (Neale etal., 2011).
机译：处理酒精和毒品依赖的政策选择备受争议，通常涉及意识形态，存在和财务方面的考虑。在禁欲和减少伤害的论述中，这是最明显的。 McKeganey，Morris，Neale和Robertson（2004）的原始研究在Neale，Nettleton和Pickering（2011）的本刊中有所描述，这激起了争论的热潮，却没有提供新的信息。更糟糕的是，那些后来被奉为倡导禁欲日程并愿意就减少危害发表一次性言论的人随后发表了新闻声明（Abetz，2010; McKeganey，2005; Watt，2007）。值得庆幸的是，Neale及其同事通过使用定性方法来建设性地解决了DORIS研究中的一些陷阱，从而进一步阐明了人们在接受治疗时会寻求什么的问题（Neale等，2011）。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号