• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Academic Librarianship >Finding Citations to Social Work Literature: The Relative Benefits of Using Web of Science, Scopus, or Google Scholar
【24h】

Finding Citations to Social Work Literature: The Relative Benefits of Using Web of Science, Scopus, or Google Scholar

机译：查找对社会工作文献的引用：使用Web of Science，Scopus或Google Scholar的相对利益

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Past studies of citation coverage of Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar do not demonstrate a consistent pattern that can be applied to the interdisciplinary mix of resources used in social work research. To determine the utility of these tools to social work researchers, an analysis of citing references to well-known social work journals was conducted. Web of Science had the fewest citing references and almost no variety in source format. Scopus provided higher citation counts, but the pattern of coverage was similar to Web of Science. Google Scholar provided substantially more citing references, but only a relatively small percentage of them were unique scholarly journal articles. The patterns of database coverage were replicated when the citations were broken out for each journal separately. The results of this analysis demonstrate the need to determine what resources constitute scholarly research and reflect the need for future researchers to consider the merits of each database before undertaking their research. This study will be of interest to scholars in library and information science as well as social work, as it facilitates a greater understanding of the strengths and limitations of each database and brings to light important considerations for conducting future research.
机译：过去对Web of Science，Scopus和Google Scholar的引文覆盖范围的研究并未显示出可用于社会工作研究中资源的跨学科混合的一致模式。为了确定这些工具对社会工作研究人员的实用性，进行了对引用著名社会工作期刊的引用的分析。 Web of Science的引用文献最少，源格式几乎没有变化。 Scopus的引用次数更高，但是覆盖范围类似于Web of Science。 Google学术搜索提供了更多的引用文献，但其中只有相对少部分是独特的学术期刊文章。分别打破各期刊的引文时，将复制数据库覆盖范围的模式。分析的结果表明，需要确定构成学术研究的资源，并反映出未来的研究人员在进行研究之前必须考虑每个数据库的优点。图书馆和信息科学以及社会工作领域的学者将对此研究感兴趣，因为它有助于更​​好地理解每个数据库的优势和局限性，并为进行未来研究提供重要的考虑因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号