• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of clinical dentistry. >Evaluation of the plaque removal efficacy of a water flosser compared to string floss in adults after a single use
【24h】

Evaluation of the plaque removal efficacy of a water flosser compared to string floss in adults after a single use

机译：与单次使用成人的牙线相比，牙线去除牙菌斑的功效评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Objective: To compare the plaque removal efficacy of a water flosser to string floss combined with a manual toothbrush after a single use. Methods: Seventy adult subjects participated in this randomized, single-use, single-blind, parallel clinical study. Subjects were assigned to one of two groups; Waterpik? Water Flosser plus a manual toothbrush (WF) or waxed string floss plus a manual toothbrush (SF). Each participant brushed for two minutes using the Bass technique. The WF group added 500 ml of warm water to the reservoir and followed the manufacturer's instructions, and the SF group used waxed string floss between each tooth, cleaning the mesial and distal surfaces as instructed. Subjects were observed to ensure they covered all areas and followed instructions. Scores were recorded for whole mouth, marginal, approximal, facial, and lingual regions for each subject using the Rustogi Modification of the Navy Plaque Index. Results: The WF group had a 74.4% reduction in whole mouth plaque and 81.6% for approximal plaque compared to 57.7% and 63.4% for the SF group, respectively (p < 0.001). The differences between the groups showed the water flosser was 29% more effective than string floss for overall plaque removal and approximal surfaces specifically (p < 0.001). The WF group was more effective in removing plaque from the marginal, lingual, and facial regions; 33%, 39%, and 24%, respectively (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The Waterpik Water Flosser and manual toothbrush is significantly more effective than a manual brush and string floss in removing plaque from tooth surfaces.
机译：目的：比较单次使用后用牙线刷和牙线刷与牙线清除牙菌斑的功效。方法：70名成人受试者参加了这项随机，单次使用，单盲，平行的临床研究。受试者被分配到两组之一。水鸟？水牙线加手动牙刷（WF）或打蜡的牙线加手动牙刷（SF）。每个参与者使用低音技术刷了两分钟。 WF组向水箱中添加500 ml热水，并按照制造商的说明进行操作; SF组在每颗牙齿之间使用蜡制的牙线清洁牙线，按照说明清洁牙髓和远端表面。观察对象以确保其覆盖所有区域并遵循指示。使用海军斑块索引的Rustogi修改记录每个受试者的整个嘴，边缘，近似，面部和舌头区域的分数。结果：WF组的全口斑块减少了74.4％，近似的斑块减少了81.6％，而SF组的分别为57.7％和63.4％（p <0.001）。两组之间的差异表明，牙线清洁剂在去除全部菌斑和近似表面上的功效比线清洁剂高29％（p <0.001）。 WF组在去除边缘，舌和面部区域的斑块方面更有效。分别为33％，39％和24％（p <0.001）。结论：Waterpik Water Flosser和手动牙刷在去除牙齿表面的牙菌斑方面比手动牙刷和牙线更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号