Limited data exist on the comparison of blood pressure (BP) measurements using aneroid and oscillometric devices. The purpose of the study was to investigate the difference in BP obtained using oscillometric and aneroid BP monitors in 9- to 10-year-old children. A total of 979 children were divided into group O, which underwent two oscillometric BP readings followed by two aneroid readings, and group A, which had BP measured in the reverse order. No significant difference was found between the mean (±standard deviation) of the two systolic BP readings obtained using the oscillometric and aneroid devices (111.5±8.6 vs 111.3±8.1 mm Hg; P=.39), whereas the mean diastolic BP was lower with the oscillometric monitor (61.5±8.0 vs 64.5±6.8 mm Hg; P<.001). A significant downward trend in BP was observed with each consecutive measurement, and agreement between the two monitors was limited. Multiple BP measurements are, therefore, recommended before the diagnosis of elevated BP or hypertension is made with either method.
展开▼
机译：关于使用无液和示波法测量血压（BP）的比较数据有限。该研究的目的是调查在9至10岁儿童中使用示波和无液BP监护仪获得的BP差异。总共979名儿童分为O组（分别接受两次示波血压读数和随后的两次无液动物读数）和A组（按相反顺序测量血压）。使用示波和无液示波器获得的两个收缩压读数的平均值（±标准偏差）之间没有显着差异（111.5±8.6 vs 111.3±8.1 mm Hg; P = .39），而平均舒张压较低使用示波监测仪（61.5±8.0 vs 64.5±6.8 mm Hg; P <.001）。每次连续测量都观察到BP的显着下降趋势，并且两个监测器之间的一致性受到限制。因此，建议在使用任何一种方法进行血压升高或高血压的诊断之前，都要进行多次血压测量。
展开▼
