...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of hand surgery, European volume >Commentary on Bolster et al. Cubital tunnel syndrome: A comparison of an endoscopic technique with a minimal invasive open technique
【24h】

Commentary on Bolster et al. Cubital tunnel syndrome: A comparison of an endoscopic technique with a minimal invasive open technique

机译:关于Bolster等的评论。肘管综合征:内镜技术与微创开放技术的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article was needed. Hand surgeons are trained to use endoscopes for wrist and elbow arthroscopy and are naturally keen to use endoscopic techniques for procedures such as carpal tunnel release and ulnar nerve decompression at the elbow. The logical expectations include smaller scars (hopefully leading to more rapid rehabilitation and return to work/ activities of daily living), equivalent or better symptom relief than open surgical procedures, and happier patients.
机译:需要这篇文章。培训了手外科医师,以使用内窥镜进行手腕和肘关节镜检查,并且自然热衷于使用内窥镜技术进行腕管松解和肘部尺神经减压等手术。符合逻辑的期望包括较小的疤痕(希望能更快地康复并恢复工作/日常生活的功能),与开放手术相比症状缓解程度相同或更好,以及患者更快乐。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号