首页> 外文期刊>The journal of clinical psychiatry >The impact of changing diagnostic criteria in posttraumatic stress disorder in a Canadian epidemiologic sample.
【24h】

The impact of changing diagnostic criteria in posttraumatic stress disorder in a Canadian epidemiologic sample.

机译:在加拿大流行病学样本中,改变诊断标准对创伤后应激障碍的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Since its inclusion in DSM-III, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has undergone a number of changes in its diagnostic criteria, including the expansion of Criterion A (traumatic stressor), the addition of symptom duration (none specified in DSM-III), and the requirement for impairment or distress (Criterion F, DSM-IV only). METHOD: This study examined the impact of changes in PTSD diagnostic criteria using a Canadian PTSD epidemiologic sample. The rates of PTSD and its correlates were evaluated in a nationally representative random sample of 3,006 adults. DSM-III, DSM-III-R, DSM-IV, and ICD-10 criteria were employed. DSM-III, DSM-III-R, and ICD-10 rates were re-evaluated, substituting specific DSM-IV criteria (A-F). RESULTS: The prevalence rates of lifetime PTSD ranged from 13.4% (DSM-III) to 13.0% (ICD-10) to 12.2% (DSM-III-R) to 9.2% (DSM-IV); all rates differed significantly from each other (P < .001). Regardless of diagnostic criteria, most people reported more than 1-year duration of symptoms, although rates were significantly higher in those with DSM-IV PTSD (68.2%, P < .0001). Rates of comorbid major depressive disorder and alcohol and substance abuse and dependence were also significantly higher (P < .05) using the DSM-IV PTSD criteria, and those with DSM-IV PTSD reported significantly higher rates of help-seeking (P < .001). When Criterion F was added to earlier versions, lifetime PTSD rates became much closer to those obtained using DSM-IV criteria: 10.6% (DSM-III), 10.2% (DSM-III-R), and 9.9% (ICD-10); however, rates fluctuated when operational definitions of Criterion F were modified. DSM-III PTSD was also substantially affected by DSM-IV Criteria A and C. CONCLUSIONS: DSM-IV PTSD may identify a more severe disorder. The addition of the clinical significance criterion (F) appeared to affect the greatest change in prevalence rates. Defining Criterion F as having both clinically significant psychological distress and functional impairment lowered the diagnostic threshold to a greater degree than did either distress or impairment alone. This information may be useful for future revisions of PTSD diagnostic criteria.
机译:背景:自从被纳入DSM-III以来,创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的诊断标准发生了许多变化,包括标准Criterion A(创伤性应激源)的扩展,症状持续时间的增加(DSM-III中未指定) )以及对损害或困扰的要求(标准C,仅适用于DSM-IV)。方法:本研究使用加拿大PTSD流行病学样本检查了PTSD诊断标准变化的影响。在全国代表性的3006名成年人中,对PTSD及其相关性的比率进行了评估。使用了DSM-III,DSM-III-R,DSM-IV和ICD-10标准。重新评估了DSM-III,DSM-III-R和ICD-10的发生率,代之以特定的DSM-IV标准(A-F)。结果:终生PTSD的患病率范围为13.4%(DSM-III)至13.0%(ICD-10)至12.2%(DSM-III-R)至9.2%(DSM-IV);所有比率彼此之间都存在显着差异(P <.001)。不管诊断标准如何,大多数人报告的症状持续时间超过1年,尽管DSM-IV PTSD的发生率显着更高(68.2%,P <.0001)。使用DSM-IV PTSD标准,合并症的重度抑郁症,酒精和药物滥用及依赖性的发生率也显着较高(P <.05),而DSM-IV PTSD的患者报告的寻求帮助的发生率(P <。 001)。当将Criterion F添加到早期版本中时,使用寿命PTSD比率变得非常接近使用DSM-IV标准获得的比率:10.6%(DSM-III),10.2%(DSM-III-R)和9.9%(ICD-10) ;但是,当修改标准F的操作定义时,费率会波动。 DSM-IV PTSD也受到DSM-IV标准A和C的实质影响。结论:DSM-IV PTSD可能识别出更严重的疾病。临床意义标准(F)的添加似乎影响了患病率的最大变化。将标准F定义为具有临床上显着的心理困扰和功能障碍的情况,可以将诊断阈值降低的程度比单独使用困扰或障碍的程度更大。此信息可能对将来PTSD诊断标准的修订很有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号