首页> 外文期刊>The journal of clinical psychiatry >Cost-effectiveness of psychotherapy for cluster C personality disorders: a decision-analytic model in the Netherlands.
【24h】

Cost-effectiveness of psychotherapy for cluster C personality disorders: a decision-analytic model in the Netherlands.

机译:C群人格障碍心理治疗的成本效益:荷兰的决策分析模型。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a formal economic evaluation of various dosages of psychotherapy for patients with avoidant, dependent, and obsessive-compulsive (ie, cluster C) personality disorders (Structured Interview for DSM-IV Personality criteria). METHOD: We developed a decision-analytic model to assess the cost-effectiveness of 5 dosages of psychotherapy (ie, long-term outpatient psychotherapy, short-term and long-term day hospital psychotherapy, and short-term and long-term inpatient psychotherapy) over a 5-year time horizon in terms of cost per recovered patient-year and cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Model parameters were estimated using data from 466 patients with cluster C personality disorders who were admitted to 6 specialist centers of psychotherapy in The Netherlands and assigned to 1 of the 5 treatment groups. Probabilistic analysis was conducted to explore the stability of results over uncertain data ranges. Analyses were conducted from both societal and payer perspectives. RESULTS: From the societal perspective and below a threshold of euro 2,637 (US Dollars 3,351.92) per recovered patient-year, short-term day hospital psychotherapy resulted in the highest level of benefit for its cost; above the threshold, short-term inpatient psychotherapy was the most cost-effective choice. In terms of cost per QALY, this switch point was at a threshold value of euro 16,570 (US Dollars 21,062.29) per QALY. From the payer perspective, the optimal strategy changed from short-term day hospital psychotherapy to short-term inpatient psychotherapy at threshold values of euro 9,874 (US Dollars 12,550.94) per recovered patient-year and euro 66,302 (US Dollars 84,277.13) per QALY. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that short-term day hospital psychotherapy and short-term inpatient psychotherapy are the most cost-effective treatment strategies for patients with cluster C personality disorders. The ultimate selection depends on what cost-effectiveness threshold is considered acceptable and what perspective is adopted.
机译:目的:对患有回避性,依赖性和强迫性(即,C类)人格障碍的患者进行各种剂量的心理治疗,以进行正式的经济评估(DSM-IV人格标准结构访谈)。方法:我们开发了一种决策分析模型,以评估5种心理治疗(即长期门诊心理治疗,短期和长期日间医院心理治疗以及短期和长期住院患者心理治疗)的成本效益)在5年的时间范围内,以每个康复患者年的成本和每个质量调整生命年(QALY)的成本为单位。模型参数是使用来自466例C群人格障碍患者的数据估算的,这些患者被荷兰的6个心理治疗专科中心收治,并分配给5个治疗组中的1个。进行了概率分析,以探索不确定数据范围内结果的稳定性。从社会和付款人的角度进行了分析。结果:从社会角度来看,每位康复患者年收入低于2637欧元(3,351.92美元)的门槛,短期日间医院心理治疗的成本效益最高;超过阈值,短期住院的心理治疗是最划算的选择。就每个QALY的成本而言,此转换点的阈值是每个QALY 16,570欧元(21,062.29美元)。从付款人的角度来看,最佳策略从短期日间医院心理治疗改为短期住院患者心理治疗,每个恢复患者年的阈值分别为9,874欧元(12,550.94美元)和每个QALY 66,302欧元(84,277.13美元)。结论:本研究表明,短期日间医院心理治疗和短期住院患者心理治疗是对C型人格障碍患者最具成本效益的治疗策略。最终选择取决于哪个成本效益阈值被认为可以接受以及采用哪种观点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号