• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The Asian and Australasian Journal of Plant Science and Biotechnology >Responsibilities and Rights of Authors, Peer Reviewers, Editors and Publishers: A Status Quo Inquiry and Assessment
【24h】

Responsibilities and Rights of Authors, Peer Reviewers, Editors and Publishers: A Status Quo Inquiry and Assessment

机译：作者，同行审稿人，编辑和出版者的责任和权利：现状调查与评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Publishing is an intricate process that involves, as the central triad, the authors, the editors, and the publisher, although the importance of the peer reviewer could extent this to a tetrad. Indeed peripheral parties such as librarians, marketing agencies, and data-base companies are linked to the publishing process, post-publication, and will thus not be the focus of this paper. When an author submits a paper to a journal, they are under several ethical and legal responsibilities. Once those responsibilities have been fulfilled, the manuscript then is in the hands of the editor(s), and the baton of responsibility is thus passed on. The editor or in most cases, the editor-in-chief (EiC), has the highest academic responsibility towards the scientific community. This is closely linked to the publisher, which publishes the journal that the EiC represents. Authors also have responsibilities towards the EiC and editor board and towards the publisher, but the opposite is also true. In this paper I wishto examine what it means to be an author, an editor, or an EiC, how this process is vetted and what responsibilities are associated with these positions. I also focus on how attention and scrutiny is often, and increasingly, focused almost exclusively on the author, but almost rarely on the EiC, the editors or the publisher. I further argue that for the publication process to be fair, transparent and effective, there must be stricter rules or guidelines concerning the responsibilities of all three parties in this triad, each of whom has inherent rights, which can, and must be exercised in a non-partisan way. The peer reviewer is often perceived as an external source of quality control, but essentially falls under the responsibility of the editor and publisher, including the choice of peer, the peer's suitable qualifications and that person's ability to effectively complete the task.
机译：发布是一个复杂的过程，作为中心三合会涉及作者，编辑和发布者，尽管同行审阅者的重要性可以将其扩展到四分之一。的确，诸如图书馆员，市场营销机构和数据库公司之类的外围团体与发布过程，发布后联系在一起，因此，这不是本文的重点。当作者向期刊提交论文时，他们要承担多种道德和法律责任。一旦完成了这些责任，手稿就交给了编辑，责任的传递就这样传递了。编辑者，或者在大多数情况下，是总编辑（EiC），对科学界负有最高的学术责任。这与发布者紧密联系，后者发布EiC代表的期刊。作者还对EiC和编辑委员会以及对出版者负有责任，但事实恰恰相反。在本文中，我希望研究成为作者，编辑或EiC意味着什么，如何审查此过程以及与这些职位相关的职责。我还关注如何越来越频繁地将注意力和审查集中在作者身上，而几乎很少集中在EiC，编辑或出版商上。我进一步争辩说，要使出版过程公正，透明和有效，必须有更严格的规则或指导方针，涉及该三方组织中所有三方的责任，每一方都有固有权利，可以并必须在其中行使权利。无党派的方式。同行评审者通常被认为是质量控制的外部来源，但基本上属于编辑者和出版者的责任，包括同行的选择，同行合适的资格以及该人有效完成任务的能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号