...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of law, medicine & ethics: a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics >Science, ethics, and the 'problems' of governing nanotechnologies.
【24h】

Science, ethics, and the 'problems' of governing nanotechnologies.

机译：科学，伦理学和控制纳米技术的“问题”。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Commentators continue to weigh in on whether there are ethical, social, and policy issues unique to nanotechnology, whether new regulatory schemes should be devised, and if so, how. Many of these commentaries fail to take into account the historical and political environment for nanotechnologies. That context affects regulatory and oversight systems as much as any new metrics to measure the effects of nanoscale materials, or organizational changes put in place to facilitate data analysis. What comes to count as a technical or social "problem" says much about the sociotechnical and political-historical networks in which technologies exist. This symposium's case studies provide insight into procedural successes and failures in the regulation of novel products, and ethical or social analyses that have attended to implications of novel, disruptive technologies. Yet what may be needed is a more fundamental consideration of forms of governance that may not just handle individual products or product types more effectively, but may also be flexible enough to respond to radically new technological systems. Nanotechnology presents an opportunity to think in transdisciplinary terms about both scientific and social concerns, rethink "knowns" about risk and how best to ameliorate or manage it, and consider how to incorporate ethical, social, and legal analyses in the conceptualization, planning, and execution of innovations.
机译：评论员继续权衡纳米技术是否存在独特的道德，社会和政策问题，是否应制定新的监管计划，以及如何制定。这些评论中有许多都没有考虑到纳米技术的历史和政治环境。这种情况对监管和监督系统的影响与对衡量纳米级材料的影响的任何新指标或为促进数据分析而进行的组织变革一样多。技术上或社会上的“问题”可以说是关于存在技术的社会技术和政治历史网络的大量论述。本次研讨会的案例研究提供了对新颖产品监管程序成功与失败的见解，以及对新颖，破坏性技术产生了影响的道德或社会分析。然而，可能需要的是对治理形式的更基本的考虑，这种治理形式不仅可以更有效地处理单个产品或产品类型，而且还可以足够灵活以响应全新的技术系统。纳米技术提供了一个机会，可以跨学科地思考科学和社会问题，重新思考有关风险以及如何最好地改善或管理风险的“已知”知识，并考虑如何将伦理，社会和法律分析纳入概念化，规划和设计中。执行创新。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号