首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of nursing education >Are we having an identity crisis?
【24h】

Are we having an identity crisis?

机译:我们有身份危机吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Recent studies have provoked our thinking about traditional ways of covering content. An example of the overkill in which we indulge, Giddens and Eddy (2009) provided the staggering revelation that we teach prelicen-sure students more than three times the number of physical assessment skills than nurses in practice routinely use! Ironside (2004) challenged the notion that "if important content is 'covered,' thinking necessarily follows" (p. 5). Rather, Ironside continued, we need to use creative pedagogies for deeper learning. In response to the recommended four major shifts in teaching practices from the Carnegie study (Benner, Sutphen, Leonard, & Day, 2010), Tanner and Bellack (2010) worried about preparing future faculty-how can graduate education prepare enough nurse educators to meet the demand? And what will be the actual preparation?
机译:最近的研究激起了我们对覆盖内容的传统方式的思考。 Giddens和Eddy(2009)就是一个我们所沉迷的过度杀伤的例子,这令人惊讶地发现,我们向执照保证学生教授的物理评估技能是护士实际使用的三倍以上!艾恩赛德(Ironside,2004)质疑“如果'重要的内容被'发现',思考就必然随之而来”(第5页)。相反,艾恩赛德继续说,我们需要使用创造性的教学法来进行更深入的学习。为了应对卡内基研究建议的四项主要的教学实践转变(Benner,Sutphen,Leonard和Day,2010年),Tanner和Bellack(2010年)担心未来的教师准备工作-研究生教育如何为足够的护士教育者做好准备以满足需求?实际的准备是什么?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号