...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of nursing administration >Hiring into advanced practice positions: The nurse practitioner versus physician assistants debate
【24h】

Hiring into advanced practice positions: The nurse practitioner versus physician assistants debate

机译：聘请高级执业职位：执业护士与医师助手的辩论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs) have long been part of the care model at our institution. Over the years, however, we have demonstrated a preference for NPs based on the belief that they can better meet our patients' needs. A recent evaluation of our care model led us to question these preferential hiring practices. After carefully examining NP and PA education and licensure requirements, scope of practice, and roles at our institution, we concluded that similarities between the roles far outweighed the differences and that our preferential hiring practices should be replaced by an individualized approach, in which advanced practice positions are filled by whichever candidate best meets the role requirements. This inclusive and analytic approach may be a useful model for other nurse leaders considering the NP/PA question.
机译：长期以来，护士从业人员（NPs）和医师助理（PAs）一直是我们机构护理模式的一部分。但是，多年来，我们已经基于对NP的偏爱，认为它们可以更好地满足患者的需求，从而证明了他们的偏爱。最近对我们的护理模式的评估使我们对这些优先雇用做法提出了质疑。在仔细检查了NP和PA的教育和执照要求，业务范围以及我们机构的职位之后，我们得出结论，职位之间的相似性远胜于差异，我们的优先招聘应以个性化方法代替，在该方法中应采用高级做法职位由最符合职位要求的候选人担任。对于其他考虑NP / PA问题的护士长，这种包容性和分析性方法可能是有用的模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号