...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of physical chemistry, A. Molecules, spectroscopy, kinetics, environment, & general theory >Reply to the Comment by S.Boressch and O.Steinhauser on the Letter by N.Nandi and B.Bagchi Entitled 'Anomalous Dielectric Relaxation of Aqueous Protein Solution'
【24h】

Reply to the Comment by S.Boressch and O.Steinhauser on the Letter by N.Nandi and B.Bagchi Entitled 'Anomalous Dielectric Relaxation of Aqueous Protein Solution'

机译：回答S.Boressch和O.Steinhauser对N.Nandi和B.Bagchi题为“蛋白质溶液的介电异常弛豫”的信函的评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In their Comment about the theoretial treatment of Nandi and Bagchi (referred to as NB)~1 on the dielectric relaxation of aqueous protein solution,Boresch and Steinhauser (referred to as BS)~2 claimed to find several shortcomings of the theoretical treatment of NB.To put the issue in perspective,we reconcile that the observed anomalies were explained by NB assuming that the total dipole moment correlation function is composed of the self-and cross-correlations between the three dynamical species present in the solution.Major objections about this work as raised by BS are 2-fold(i) presence of a factor of (1/N) in the exact expression of dielectric function (eq 2.1 in ref 1) and (ii) interpretation of the correlation factor used in ref 1.We thank BS for their comments on our work,although we disagree with many of their comments.Our response is given below.
机译：在关于Nandi和Bagchi（称为NB）〜1对蛋白质水溶液介电弛豫的理论处理的评论中，Boresch和Steinhauser（称为BS）〜2声称发现了NB理论处理的几个缺点为了使问题更直观，我们认为NB解释了观测到的异常，假设总偶极矩相关函数由解中存在的三个动力学物种之间的自相关和互相关组成。由BS提出的工作是介电函数的精确表达式（参考文献1中的等式2.1）中（i）因子（1 / N）的2倍存在和（ii）参考文献1中使用的相关因子的解释。我们感谢BS对我们的工作发表的评论，尽管我们不同意他们的许多评论。我们的答复如下。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号