首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry >The effect of current bleaching agents on the color of light-polymerized composites in vitro.
【24h】

The effect of current bleaching agents on the color of light-polymerized composites in vitro.

机译:目前的漂白剂在体外对光聚合复合材料颜色的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Bleaching agents may affect the color of existing composite restorations. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of 10% carbamide peroxide and 10% hydrogen peroxide on the color of light-polymerized hybrid, macrofilled, and polyacid-modified composites. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two light-polymerized hybrid composites (3M Valux and Spectrum TPH), 1 macrofilled condensable composite (Solitaire), and 2 polyacid-modified composites (Dyract AP and Compoglass) were used. The hybrid composites served as controls. The color of 8 specimens of each material was analyzed by use of a spectrophotometer before bleaching. The specimens were then divided randomly into 2 subgroups (n=4). One group was immersed in 10% carbamide peroxide solution and the other in 10% hydrogen peroxide, for 8 hours each for 14 consecutive days. After bleaching, color changes (Delta E) were determined for each material and compared by use of the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by the Mann-Whitney U test (P<.05). RESULTS: After bleaching with carbamide peroxide, the color changes (Delta E) for Dyract AP (2.18; SD = 1.41), Compoglass (1.14; SD = 0.26) and Solitaire (1.56; SD = 0.89) were higher than the color changes recorded for 3M Valux (0.63; SD = 3.60), and Spectrum TPH (0.66; SD = 1.24). The differences between materials bleached with carbamide peroxide were not statistically significant. After bleaching with hydrogen peroxide, the color changes for Dyract AP (9.39; SD = 0.53) and Compoglass (5.15; SD = 0.52) were higher than the changes recorded for Spectrum TPH (4.53; SD = 1.53) and 3M Valux (3.41; SD = 4.40), whereas the color change of Solitaire (3.69; SD = 0.57) was significantly higher than that of 3M Valux (P=.01). The color changes for all restorative materials tested were clinically detectable after the application of 10% hydrogen peroxide. However, clinically noticeable discoloration was observed only for Dyract AP treated with 10% carbamide peroxide. CONCLUSION: In comparison to 10% carbamide peroxide, 10% hydrogen peroxide caused more color changes in the composites tested.
机译:问题陈述:漂白剂可能会影响现有复合修复体的颜色。目的:本研究的目的是比较10%的过氧化脲和10%的过氧化氢对光聚合杂化材料,大填充和多酸改性复合材料颜色的影响。材料和方法:使用了两种轻聚合的杂化复合材料(3M Valux和Spectrum TPH),一种大填充的可冷凝复合材料(纸牌)和两种多元酸改性的复合材料(Dyract AP和Compoglass)。杂化复合材料用作对照。在漂白之前,使用分光光度计分析每种材料的8个样品的颜色。然后将标本随机分为2个亚组(n = 4)。一组浸入10%过氧化脲溶液中,另一组浸入10%过氧化氢中,连续14天,每次8小时。漂白后,确定每种材料的颜色变化(Delta E),并使用Kruskal-Wallis试验进行比较,然后使用Mann-Whitney U试验进行比较(P <.05)。结果:用过氧化脲漂白后,Dyract AP(2.18; SD = 1.41),Compoglass(1.14; SD = 0.26)和纸牌(1.56; SD = 0.89)的颜色变化(ΔE)高于记录的颜色变化3M Valux(0.63; SD = 3.60)和Spectrum TPH(0.66; SD = 1.24)。用过氧化脲漂白的材料之间的差异没有统计学意义。用过氧化氢漂白后,Dyract AP(9.39; SD = 0.53)和Compoglass(5.15; SD = 0.52)的颜色变化高于Spectrum TPH(4.53; SD = 1.53)和3M Valux(3.41; SD = 4.40),而纸牌(3.69; SD = 0.57)的颜色变化明显高于3M Valux(P = .01)。在使用10%的过氧化氢后,在临床上可检测到所有测试的修复材料的颜色变化。但是,只有用10%过氧化脲处理的Dyract AP才能观察到临床上明显的变色。结论:与10%的过氧化脲相比,10%的过氧化氢在测试的复合材料中引起了更多的颜色变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号