首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry >Use of a porcelain color discrimination test to evaluate color difference formulas.
【24h】

Use of a porcelain color discrimination test to evaluate color difference formulas.

机译:使用瓷色辨别测试评估色差公式。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Limited studies have indicated that an alternative small color difference formula would be more appropriate for use in dentistry. PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were to determine which color difference formula provides a superior degree of fit for judgments of perceptibility and acceptability and to determine if different groups of evaluators have different levels of perceptibility and acceptability for each color difference formula. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Each observer from 4 groups (4 dentists, 4 dental assistants, 4 technicians, and 4 patients)made independent observations of perceptibility and acceptability judgments on pairs of opaque porcelain (VitaOmega 900) disks (14 mm in diameter by 3 mm thick). Color differences of the pairs were calculated using DeltaE*(ab), DeltaE(CMC)(l:c), and DeltaE(2000) color difference formulas, and the observer judgments were regressed to each color difference in dependently for perceptibility and acceptability. The area under the receiver operator curves was calculated and ranked, and the optimal factor for the CMC (Colour Measurement Committee, Society of Dyers and Colourists, Great Britain) color difference formula was chosen. A repeated measures maximum likelihood ANOVA (alpha=.05) was applied to determine statistical significance of fit among the observer groups, and the various color difference formulas for both perceptibility and acceptability. Tukey-Kramer Adjustment (alpha=.05) was used as a post hoc test. RESULTS: A difference in the degree of fit of the judgments of color differences was found for the 3 formulas (P=.001)and the 2 judgment types (P<.001) studied, with no significant interaction (P=.979). The Tukey-Kramer test identified a lower degree of fit for the DeltaE*(ab) formula compared to DeltaE(CMC)(2:3) and DeltaE(2000) formulas. No significant difference was found in the mean judgment levels among the observer groups (P=.474) studied, nor within any interaction (P>.404). CONCLUSIONS: DeltaE(2000) and DeltaE(CMC)(2:3) colordifference formulas provide a better fit to the calculated color differences,therefore providing better indicators of human perceptibility and acceptability of color differences between tooth colors.
机译:问题陈述:有限的研究表明,另一种较小的色差公式将更适合用于牙科。目的:本研究的目的是确定哪个色差公式为判断可感知性和可接受性提供了更高的拟合度,并确定不同评估者组对于每个色差公式是否具有不同水平的可感知性和可接受性。材料与方法:来自4组(4位牙医,4位牙科助手,4位技术员和4位患者)的每个观察者对成对的不透明瓷盘(VitaOmega 900)直径(直径14毫米乘3毫米)进行可观察性和可接受性判断的独立观察。厚)。使用DeltaE *(ab),DeltaE(CMC)(1:c)和DeltaE(2000)色差公式计算出两对色差,并且观察者的判断依赖于可感知性和可接受性回归到每个色差。计算并排序接收器操作员曲线下的面积,并为CMC(英国染料和颜料协会,颜色测量委员会)色差公式选择最佳因子。应用重复测量最大似然方差分析(alpha = .05)来确定观察者组之间拟合的统计显着性,以及可感知性和可接受性的各种色差公式。 Tukey-Kramer调整(alpha = .05)被用作事后检验。结果:研究的3个公式(P = .001)和2个判断类型(P <.001)的色差判断的契合度存在差异,没有显着的交互作用(P = .979) 。与DeltaE(CMC)(2:3)和DeltaE(2000)公式相比,Tukey-Kramer测试确定了DeltaE *(ab)公式的拟合度较低。研究观察者组之间的平均判断水平(P = .474)以及任何交互作用(P> .404)均未发现显着差异。结论:DeltaE(2000)和DeltaE(CMC)(2:3)色差公式可以更好地拟合计算出的色差,因此可以更好地指示人对牙齿之间色差的可感知性和可接受性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号