• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of sexual medicine >Infection rates of rifampin/gentamicin-coated Titan Coloplast penile implants. Comparison with Inhibizone-impregnated AMS penile implants.
【24h】

Infection rates of rifampin/gentamicin-coated Titan Coloplast penile implants. Comparison with Inhibizone-impregnated AMS penile implants.

机译：利福平/庆大霉素涂层的泰坦Coloplast阴茎植入物的感染率。与浸有Inhibizone的AMS阴茎植入物的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

INTRODUCTION: It is a common practice to soak Titan((R)) Coloplast penile implants in antibiotic solution prior to implantation. Experience with Inhibizone impregnation suggests that rifampin coating significantly reduces infection rates of penile implant surgery. In this article we describe the results of coating Titan Coloplast penile implants with rifampin/gentamicin solution. AIM: To compare infection rates of Titan((R)) Coloplast penile implants coated with vancomycin/gentamycin, rifampin/gentamicin, and Inhibizone-impregnated American Medical Systems (AMS) penile implants. METHODS: Chart review was done for all Mentor/Coloplast and AMS implant surgeries performed at our center between the dates January 1, 2002 and February 8, 2010. Infection rates for Titan((R)) Coloplast penile implants coated with vancomycin/gentamycin, rifampin/gentamicin, and Inhibizone-impregnated (AMS) penile implants were compared. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Infection rates for penile implants coated with different antibiotics. RESULTS: Infection rates for Titan((R)) Coloplast penile implants coated with vancomycin/gentamycin and Inhibizone-impregnated (AMS) penile implants was 4.4% and 1.3%, respectively (P = 0.05). None of the rifampin/gentamicin-coated Titan((R)) Coloplast penile implants have developed infection. Rifampin is the common antibiotic both in rifampin/gentamicin-coated Coloplast implants and Inhibizone((R)) . The infection rate in this combined rifampin/gentamicin-coated Titan Coloplast implants and Inhibizone-coated AMS implants group was 0.63% (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Both rifampin/gentamicin-coated Titan((R)) Coloplast penile implants and Inhibizone-impregnated (AMS) penile implants appear to have lower infection rates compared with vancomycin/gentamycin-coated Titan((R)) Coloplast penile implants The present study does not suggest superiority of rifampin/gentamicin-coated Titan((R)) Coloplast penile implants or Inhibizone-impregnated (AMS) penile implants but we strongly suggest that all Titan((R)) Coloplast penile implants should be coated with rifampin/gentamicin solution.
机译：引言：在植入前，将Titan（R）Coloplast阴茎植入物浸泡在抗生素溶液中​​是一种常见的做法。抑制素浸渍的经验表明，利福平涂层显着降低了阴茎植入物手术的感染率。在本文中，我们描述了用利福平/庆大霉素溶液涂覆Titan Titan Coloplast阴茎植入物的结果。目的：比较涂有万古霉素/庆大霉素，利福平/庆大霉素和浸有抑制区的美国医疗系统（AMS）阴茎植入物的Titan（R）Coloplast阴茎植入物的感染率。方法：在2002年1月1日至2010年2月8日期间，对在我们中心进行的所有Mentor / Coloplast和AMS植入物手术进行了图表审查。Titan（R）Coloplast阴茎植入物涂有万古霉素/庆大霉素，比较了利福平/庆大霉素和浸有抑制剂的阴茎植入物。主要观察指标：涂有不同抗生素的阴茎植入物的感染率。结果：涂有万古霉素/庆大霉素和浸有抑制区的（AMS）阴茎植入物的Titan（R）Coloplast阴茎植入物的感染率分别为4.4％和1.3％（P = 0.05）。利福平/庆大霉素包被的Titan（R）Coloplast阴茎植入物均未发生感染。利福平是利福平/庆大霉素涂层的Coloplast植入物和Inhibizone（R）的常见抗生素。利福平/庆大霉素涂层Titan Coloplast植入物和抑制剂包裹的AMS植入物组合的感染率为0.63％（P = 0.03）。结论：与万古霉素/庆大霉素涂层的Titan Coloplast阴茎植入物相比，利福平/庆大霉素涂层的Titan Coloplast阴茎植入物和抑制素浸渍的（AMS）阴茎植入物似乎具有更低的感染率。研究并未表明利福平/庆大霉素包衣的Titan（R）Coloplast阴茎植入物或抑制抑制剂浸渍（AMS）阴茎植入物的优越性，但我们强烈建议所有Titan（R）Coloplast阴茎植入物均应涂有利福平/庆大霉素溶液。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号