首页> 外文期刊>The journal of sexual medicine >The G-Spot Article-Some of Its Limitations
【24h】

The G-Spot Article-Some of Its Limitations

机译:G点文章-一些局限性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Dear Editor,We write to express our surprise at the publication of the study by Ostrzenski on the "G-spot anatomy: a new discovery." While it was critical about previous anatomical studies on the G-spot, especially that of Thabet, it failed to present any limitations of his own study, the accepted procedure in any scientific paper and usually reflected by peer review recommending that these be mentioned [1-3]. What are these limitations? They would have to include:1. The lack of any sexual history of the female in question so there is no evidence that she ever had so-called "G-spot" orgasms from penile-vaginal intercourse or by digital stimulation of the anterior vaginal wall.
机译:亲爱的编辑,我们为Ostrzenski发表的有关“ G点解剖:一个新发现”的研究感到惊讶。尽管对先前关于G点的解剖学研究(尤其是Thabet的解剖学研究)至关重要,但它并没有提出他自己的研究的任何局限性,在任何科学论文中都可以接受,并且通常在同行评审中反映,建议予以提及[1] -3]。这些限制是什么?它们必须包括:1。所述女性没有任何性病史,因此没有证据表明她曾经因阴茎-阴道性交或通过阴道前壁的数字刺激而发生所谓的“ G点”性高潮。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号