...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of the American Dental Association >Evaluation of the spatter-reduction effectiveness of two dry-field isolation techniques
【24h】

Evaluation of the spatter-reduction effectiveness of two dry-field isolation techniques

机译:两种干场隔离技术的防溅效果评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: The authors conducted a study to compare the effectiveness of two dry-field isolation techniques with that of a control technique (no isolation) in reducing spatter from a dental operative site. Methods: The authors designed a benchtop experiment to evaluate spatter patterns after performing simulated occlusal surface preparations on three typodont teeth in a dental manikin. Fluorescein dye served as the marker to enable visualization of the spatter distribution. The authors compared the effectiveness of a nonisolated control consisting of high-volume evacuation (HVE) alone with that of two dry-field isolation techniques: a dental dam with HVE and the Isolite system (Isolite Systems, Santa Barbara, Calif). Results: The authors performed a two-way analysis of variance. Both the Isolite device and the dental dam with HVE exhibited a significant decrease in the number of contaminated squares (P <.001) compared with that for the nonisolated control. In addition, overall, the results showed no statistically significant difference between the Isolite system and the dental dam with HVE (P =.126). Conclusions: The study results showed that use of a dental dam with HVE or the Isolite system significantly reduced spatter overall compared with use of HVE alone. Clinical Implications: Isolation with a dental dam and HVE or with the Isolite system appears to aid in the reduction of spatter during operative dental procedures, potentially reducing exposure to oral pathogens.
机译:背景:作者进行了一项研究,比较了两种干场隔离技术与控制技术(无隔离)在减少牙科手术部位飞溅物方面的效果。方法:作者设计了一个台式实验,以在对人体模型中的三个台齿进行模拟咬合表面准备后评估飞溅图案。荧光染料用作标记,以使飞溅分布可视化。作者比较了仅由大量疏散(HVE)组成的非隔离控件与两种干场隔离技术的有效性:带有HVE的牙坝和Isolite系统(Isolite Systems,圣巴巴拉,加利福尼亚)。结果:作者进行了方差的双向分析。与非隔离对照组相比,Isolite装置和具有HVE的牙坝均显示出受污染方格的数量显着减少(P <.001)。另外,总体而言,结果显示,Isolite系统与具有HVE的牙坝之间没有统计学上的显着差异(P = .126)。结论:研究结果表明,与单独使用HVE相比,使用带有HVE或Isolite系统的牙坝可显着减少飞溅。临床意义:用牙坝和HVE或Isolite系统隔离似乎有助于减少手术过程中的飞溅物,从而可能减少口腔病原体的暴露。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号