...
【24h】

Standardized letter of recommendation for pediatric fellowship selection.

机译:选择儿科研究金的标准推荐信。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To develop a pediatric otolaryngology fellowship selection standardized letter of recommendation (SLOR). STUDY DESIGN: SLOR and narrative letter of recommendation (NLOR) comparison study. METHODS: An SLOR was created to investigate qualities desired in fellows using five content-based categories: writer background, comparison of the applicant to contemporaries and predecessors, applicant's qualifications for pediatric otolaryngology, a global assessment of the applicant, and a summary statement about the applicant. In phase I, the SLORs were completed, including writing time, by the applicant's pediatric otolaryngology chief. In phase II, letters were ranked on Likert-type scales for the content-based categories, reviewer's overall ranking, and ease of review by six otolaryngologists. Reviewers recorded time needed to review each letter. RESULTS: Nineteen SLORs (73%) were collected. Mean writing time was 8.84 +/- 3.87 minutes. Interrater reliability was higher on the SLORs in the content-based sections and the overall ranking. Ranking times were lower on the SLORs. Mean and median rankings were higher on the SLORs for writer background, comparison of the applicant to contemporaries and predecessors, applicant's qualifications for pediatric otolaryngology, and ease of review; mean global assessment of the applicant, summary statement about the applicant, and overall rankings were lower on the SLORs. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first inquiry using an SLOR developed for otolaryngology. SLORs are an alternative to NLORs for fellowship selection that offers improved reliability and efficiency. Further investigation using SLORs in otolaryngology residency selection is merited.
机译:目的/假设:制定小儿耳鼻喉科奖学金选择标准推荐信(SLOR)。研究设计:SLOR和叙述性推荐信(NLOR)比较研究。方法:使用五个基于内容的类别创建了SLOR,以研究同伴所需要的素质:作者背景,申请人与同时代和前辈的比较,申请人的儿科耳鼻喉科专业资格,申请人的整体评估以及关于申请人。在第一阶段,申请人的儿科耳鼻喉科主任完成了SLOR,包括撰写时间。在第二阶段,对字母进行了李克特式量表的分类,这些内容基于内容的类别,审阅者的总体排名以及六位耳鼻喉科医师易于审阅的程度。审阅者记录了审阅每个字母所需的时间。结果:收集到19个SLOR(73%)。平均书写时间为8.84 +/- 3.87分钟。在基于内容的部分和总体排名中,SLOR的interrater可靠性更高。 SLOR的排名时间更低。在SLOR方面,作者背景,申请人与同时代和前辈的比较,申请人的儿科耳鼻喉科资格以及易于审核的平均和中位数排名较高。在SLOR上,申请人的平均总体评估,有关申请人的摘要声明以及总体排名较低。结论:据我们所知,这是首次针对耳鼻喉科使用SLOR的询问。 SLOR是NLOR的奖学金选择的替代方案,可提高可靠性和效率。值得在耳鼻喉科住院医师选择中使用SLOR进行进一步研究。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号