...
首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Cardiology >Safety and Efficacy of Using the Viabahn Endoprosthesis for Percutaneous Treatment of Vascular Access Complications After Transfemoral Aortic Valve Implantation
【24h】

Safety and Efficacy of Using the Viabahn Endoprosthesis for Percutaneous Treatment of Vascular Access Complications After Transfemoral Aortic Valve Implantation

机译:经股动脉主动脉瓣植入后使用Viabahn内支架术经皮治疗血管通路并发症的安全性和有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Vascular access complications (VACs) remain one of the biggest challenges when performing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). This study aimed to investigate the short- and medium-term safety and efficacy of the Viabahn endoprosthesis (Gore, Flagstaff, AZ) when used to treat TAVI-induced vascular injury. Over a 40-month period, 354 patients underwent true percutaneous transfemoral (TF)-TAVI using a CoreValve and Prostar-XL closure system; this was our study population. A VAC leading to acute intervention occurred in 72 patients (20.3%) - of these, 18 were managed by balloon angioplasty, 48 were treated by Viabahn stenting (technical success rate 98%), and 6 needed surgical intervention. Overall, this approach resulted in a major VAC rate of 3.1% (n = 11) in our study cohort. Length of hospitalization and 30-day mortality rates were comparable in patients with a VAC treated by Viabahn stenting versus patients without vascular complications. Two patients (4.5%) presented with new-onset claudication; one of them had the stent implanted covering the deep femoral artery (DFA). At medium-term follow-up (median 372 days; range 55 to 978 days) duplex ultrasound showed 100% patency of the Viabahn endoprostheses with no signs of stent fracture or in-stent stenosis/occlusion. In conclusion, the use of self-expanding covered stents is safe and effective in case of TF-TAVI-induced vascular injury, with good short- and medium-term outcomes. Importantly, coverage of the DFA should be avoided. If confirmed by long-term (>5 years) follow-up studies, this strategy for treating TAVI-induced VAC may be used routinely in high-risk patients. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:在进行经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)时,血管通路并发症(VACs)仍然是最大的挑战之一。这项研究旨在研究Viabahn内置假体(Gore,Flagstaff,AZ)在治疗TAVI引起的血管损伤时的短期和中期安全性和有效性。在40个月的时间内,使用CoreValve和Prostar-XL闭合系统对354例患者进行了真正的经皮经股(TF)-TAVI治疗;这是我们的研究人群。导致急性干预的VAC发生在72例患者中(20.3%)-其中18例通过球囊血管成形术治疗,48例通过Viabahn支架置入术(技术成功率98%),另外6例需要手术干预。总体而言,在我们的研究队列中,这种方法导致主要VAC率为3.1%(n = 11)。通过Viabahn支架置入VAC的患者与无血管并发症的患者的住院时间和30天死亡率相当。 2例(4.5%)表现为lau行新发;行;其中之一植入了覆盖股骨深部动脉(DFA)的支架。在中期随访时(中位372天;范围为55至978天),双工超声显示Viabahn内置假体100%通畅,没有支架断裂或支架内狭窄/闭塞的迹象。总之,在TF-TAVI引起的血管损伤的情况下,使用自扩张式带覆膜支架是安全有效的,具有良好的短期和中期效果。重要的是,应避免涵盖DFA。如果经过长期(> 5年)的随访研究证实,这种治疗TAVI诱导的VAC的策略可常规用于高危患者。 (C)2015 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号